Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sihao He 0001

dblp:363/7024-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-0560-2935ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% Graph learning · 29% Trustworthy machine learning · 29%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
graph contrastive learning
1.012026
Structures Meet Semantics: Multimodal Fusion via Graph Contrastive Learning · AAAI 2026
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › affective computing › sentiment analysis
multimodal sentiment analysis
1.012026
Structures Meet Semantics: Multimodal Fusion via Graph Contrastive Learning · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › efficient graph neural network
graph condensation
0.912025
Federated Graph Condensation with Information Bottleneck Principles · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy-preserving machine learning
0.912025
Federated Graph Condensation with Information Bottleneck Principles · AAAI 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal fusion
0.312026
Structures Meet Semantics: Multimodal Fusion via Graph Contrastive Learning · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph contrastive learning · 2.0attention mechanism · 2.0semantic anchors · 1.0semantic anchor · 1.0membership inference attack · 0.9information bottleneck · 0.9gradient matching · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Structures Meet Semantics: Multimodal Fusion via Graph Contrastive Learning
abstract
Multimodal sentiment analysis (MSA) aims to infer emotional states by effectively integrating textual, acoustic, and visual modalities. Despite notable progress, existing multimodal fusion methods often neglect modality-specific structural dependencies and semantic misalignment, limiting their quality, interpretability, and robustness. To address these challenges, we propose a novel framework called the Structural-Semantic Unifier (SSU), which systematically integrates modality-specific structural information and cross-modal semantic grounding for enhanced multimodal representations. Specifically, SSU dynamically constructs modality-specific graphs by leveraging linguistic syntax for text and a lightweight, text-guided attention mechanism for acoustic and visual modalities, thus capturing detailed intra-modal relationships and semantic interactions. We further introduce a semantic anchor, derived from global textual semantics, that serves as a cross-modal alignment hub, effectively harmonizing heterogeneous semantic spaces across modalities. Additionally, we develop a multi-view contrastive learning objective that promotes discriminability, semantic consistency, and structural coherence across intra- and inter-modal views. Extensive evaluations on two widely-used benchmark datasets, CMU-MOSI and CMU-MOSEI, demonstrate that SSU consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance while significantly reducing computational overhead compared to prior methods. Comprehensive qualitative analyses further validate SSU’s interpretability and its ability to capture nuanced emotional patterns through semantically-grounded interactions.
Jiangfeng Sun 0003, Sihao He 0001, Zhonghong Ou, Meina Song
AAAI2
2025 Federated Graph Condensation with Information Bottleneck Principles
abstract
Graph condensation (GC), which reduces the size of a large-scale graph by synthesizing a small-scale condensed graph as its substitution, has benefited various graph learning tasks. However, existing GC methods rely on centralized data storage, which is unfeasible for real-world decentralized data distribution, and overlook data holders' privacy-preserving requirements. To bridge this gap, we propose and study the novel problem of federated graph condensation (FGC) for graph neural networks (GNNs). Specifically, we first propose a general framework for FGC, where we decouple the typical gradient matching process for GC into client-side gradient calculation and server-side gradient matching, integrating knowledge from multiple clients' subgraphs into one smaller condensed graph. Nevertheless, our empirical studies show that under the federated setting, the condensed graph will consistently leak data membership privacy, i.e., the condensed graph during federated training can be utilized to steal training data under the membership inference attack (MIA). To tackle this issue, we innovatively incorporate information bottleneck principles into the FGC, which only needs to extract partial node features in one local pre-training step and utilize the features during federated training. Theoretical and experimental analyses demonstrate that our framework consistently protects membership privacy during training. Meanwhile, it can achieve comparable and even superior performance against existing centralized GC and federated graph learning (FGL) methods.
Bo Yan 0005, Sihao He 0001, Cheng Yang 0002, Shang Liu 0001, Yang Cao 0011, Chuan Shi 0001
AAAI2