Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lorenzo Bardone

dblp:364/7944 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 59% Representation and self-supervised learning · 28% Optimization for machine learning · 13%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 50% Computational complexity · 50%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
1.932025
Feature learning from non-Gaussian inputs: the case of Independent Component Analysis in high dimensions · ICML 2025
Sliding Down the Stairs: How Correlated Latent Variables Accelerate Learning with Neural Networks · ICML 2024
Learning from higher-order correlations, efficiently: hypothesis tests, random features, and neural networks · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › blind source separation
independent component analysis
0.912025
Feature learning from non-Gaussian inputs: the case of Independent Component Analysis in high dimensions · ICML 2025
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.912025
Feature learning from non-Gaussian inputs: the case of Independent Component Analysis in high dimensions · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic gradient methods
stochastic gradient descent
0.912025
Feature learning from non-Gaussian inputs: the case of Independent Component Analysis in high dimensions · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
computational-statistical gap
0.812024
Learning from higher-order correlations, efficiently: hypothesis tests, random features, and neural networks · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional learning
0.812024
Sliding Down the Stairs: How Correlated Latent Variables Accelerate Learning with Neural Networks · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.812024
Sliding Down the Stairs: How Correlated Latent Variables Accelerate Learning with Neural Networks · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online SGD · 2.5stochastic gradient descent · 1.7FastICA · 1.7tensor PCA · 0.8random features · 0.8low-degree conjecture · 0.8hypothesis testing · 0.8cumulant analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Feature learning from non-Gaussian inputs: the case of Independent Component Analysis in high dimensions
abstract
Deep neural networks learn structured features from complex, non-Gaussian inputs, but the mechanisms behind this process remain poorly understood. Our work is motivated by the observation that the first-layer filters learnt by deep convolutional neural networks from natural images resemble those learnt by independent component analysis (ICA), a simple unsupervised method that seeks the most non-Gaussian projections of its inputs. This similarity suggests that ICA provides a simple, yet principled model for studying feature learning. Here, we leverage this connection to investigate the interplay between data structure and optimisation in feature learning for the most popular ICA algorithm, FastICA, and stochastic gradient descent (SGD), which is used to train deep networks. We rigorously establish that FastICA requires at least $n\gtrsim d^4$ samples to recover a single non-Gaussian direction from $d$-dimensional inputs on a simple synthetic data model. We show that vanilla online SGD outperforms FastICA, and prove that the optimal sample complexity $n\gtrsim d^2$ can be reached by smoothing the loss, albeit in a data-dependent way. We finally demonstrate the existence of a search phase for FastICA on ImageNet, and discuss how the strong non-Gaussianity of said images compensates for the poor sample complexity of FastICA.
Fabiola Ricci, Lorenzo Bardone, Sebastian Goldt
ICML2
2024 Sliding Down the Stairs: How Correlated Latent Variables Accelerate Learning with Neural Networks
abstract
Neural networks extract features from data using stochastic gradient descent (SGD). In particular, higher-order input cumulants (HOCs) are crucial for their performance. However, extracting information from the $p$th cumulant of $d$-dimensional inputs is computationally hard: the number of samples required to recover a single direction from an order-$p$ tensor (tensor PCA) using SGD grows as $d^{p−1}$, which is prohibitive for high-dimensional inputs. This result raises the question of how neural networks extract relevant directions from the HOCs of their inputs efficiently. Here, we show that correlations between latent variables along the directions encoded in different input cumulants speed up learning from higher-order correlations. We show this effect analytically by deriving nearly sharp thresholds for the number of samples required by a single neuron to recover these directions using online SGD from a random start in high dimensions. Our analytical results are confirmed in simulations of two-layer neural networks and unveil a new mechanism for hierarchical learning in neural networks
Lorenzo Bardone, Sebastian Goldt
ICML1
2024 Learning from higher-order correlations, efficiently: hypothesis tests, random features, and neural networks
abstract
Neural networks excel at discovering statistical patterns in high-dimensional data sets. In practice, higher-order cumulants, which quantify the non-Gaussian correlations between three or more variables, are particularly important for the performance of neural networks. But how efficient are neural networks at extracting features from higher-order cumulants? We study this question in the spiked cumulant model, where the statistician needs to recover a privileged direction or "spike'' from the order-$p\ge 4$ cumulants of $d$-dimensional inputs. We first discuss the fundamental statistical and computational limits of recovering the spike by analysing the number of samples $n$ required to strongly distinguish between inputs from the spiked cumulant model and isotropic Gaussian inputs. Existing literature established the presence of a wide statistical-to-computational gap in this problem. We deepen this line of work by finding an exact formula for the likelihood ratio norm which proves that statistical distinguishability requires $n\gtrsim d$ samples, while distinguishing the two distributions in polynomial time requires $n \gtrsim d^2$ samples for a wide class of algorithms, i.e. those covered by the low-degree conjecture. Numerical experiments show that neural networks do indeed learn to distinguish the two distributions with quadratic sample complexity, while ``lazy'' methods like random features are not better than random guessing in this regime. Our results show that neural networks extract information from higher-order correlations in the spiked cumulant model efficiently, and reveal a large gap in the amount of data required by neural networks and random features to learn from higher-order cumulants.
Eszter Székely, Lorenzo Bardone, Federica Gerace, Sebastian Goldt
NeurIPS2