VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ignacio Meza De La Jara
dblp:364/8272
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › neural network representation learning
intermediate representation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mysteries of the Deep: Role of Intermediate Representations in Out of Distribution Detection · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mysteries of the Deep: Role of Intermediate Representations in Out of Distribution Detection · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mysteries of the Deep: Role of Intermediate Representations in Out of Distribution Detection · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
residual connections · 0.9pre-trained model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mysteries of the Deep: Role of Intermediate Representations in Out of Distribution DetectionabstractOut-of-distribution (OOD) detection is essential for reliably deploying machine learning models in the wild. Yet, most methods treat large pre-trained models as monolithic encoders and rely solely on their final-layer representations for detection. We challenge this wisdom. We reveal the intermediate layers of pre-trained models, shaped by residual connections that subtly transform input projections, can encode surprisingly rich and diverse signals for detecting distributional shifts. Importantly, to exploit latent representation diversity across layers, we introduce an entropy-based criterion to automatically identify layers offering the most complementary information in a training-free setting, without access to OOD data. We show that selectively incorporating these intermediate representations can increase the accuracy of OOD detection by up to $10\%$ in far-OOD and over $7\%$ in near-OOD benchmarks compared to state-of-the-art training-free methods across various model architectures and training objectives. Our findings reveal a new avenue for OOD detection research and uncover the impact of various training objectives and model architectures on confidence-based OOD detection methods. Ignacio Meza De La Jara, Cristian Rodriguez Opazo, Damien Teney, Damith Chinthana Ranasinghe, Ehsan Abbasnejad |
NeurIPS | 1 |