VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Angel Ding
dblp:365/9009
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection › privacy regulation
GDPR |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SoK: Technical Implementation and Human Impact of Internet Privacy Regulations · SP 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy regulation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SoK: Technical Implementation and Human Impact of Internet Privacy Regulations · SP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
taxonomy development · 1.5systematic literature review · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | SoK: Technical Implementation and Human Impact of Internet Privacy RegulationsabstractGrowing recognition of the potential for exploitation of personal data and of the shortcomings of prior privacy regimes has led to the passage of a multitude of new privacy regulations. Some of these laws—notably the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)—have been the focus of large bodies of research by the computer science community, while others have received less attention. In this work, we analyze a set of 24 privacy laws and data protection regulations drawn from around the world—both those that have frequently been studied by computer scientists and those that have not—and develop a taxonomy of rights granted and obligations imposed by these laws. We then leverage this taxonomy to systematize 270 technical research papers published in computer science venues that investigate the impact of these laws and explore how technical solutions can complement legal protections. Finally, we analyze the results in this space through an inter-disciplinary lens and make recommendations for future work at the intersection of computer science and legal privacy. Eleanor Birrell, Jay Rodolitz, Angel Ding, Jenna Lee, Emily McReynolds, Jevan A. Hutson, Ada Lerner |
SP | 3 |