Given two polygonal curves P and Q defined by n and m vertices with m ≤ n, we show that the discrete Fréchet distance in 1D cannot be approximated within a factor of 2-ε in 𝒪((nm)^{1-δ}) time for any ε, δ > 0 unless OVH fails. Using a similar construction, we extend this bound for curves in 2D under the continuous or discrete Fréchet distance and increase the approximation factor to 1+√2-ε (resp. 3-ε) if the curves lie in the Euclidean space (resp. in the L_∞-space). This strengthens the lower bound by Buchin, Ophelders, and Speckmann to the case where m = n^α for α ∈ (0,1) and increases the approximation factor of 1.001 by Bringmann. For the discrete Fréchet distance in 1D, we provide an approximation algorithm with optimal approximation factor and almost optimal running time. Further, for curves in any dimension embedded in any L_p space, we present a (3+ε)-approximation algorithm for the continuous and discrete Fréchet distance using 𝒪((n+m²)log n) time, which almost matches the approximation factor of the lower bound for the L_∞ metric.

This repository contains benchmark instances for (s,t)-max-flow/min-cut, which were submitted to the 13th DIMACS Implementation Challenge. The instances are derived from the bicriteria polygon aggregation problem, which is studied in the following publications: Bicriteria Shapes: Hierarchical Grouping and Aggregation of Polygons with an Efficient Graph-Cut Approach. Peter Rottmann, Anne Driemel, Herman Haverkort, Heiko Röglin, Jan-Henrik Haunert. In: ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems, vol. 11(1), ACM, pages 3:1--3:23, 2025. A Simpler Approach for Monotone Parametric Minimum Cut: Finding the Breakpoints in Order. Arne Beines, Michael Kaibel, Philip Mayer, Petra Mutzel, Jonas Sauer. In: Proceedings of the 27th Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experiments (ALENEX'25), SIAM, pages 29--41, 2025. Bicriteria Polygon Aggregation with Arbitrary Shapes. Lotte Blank, David Eppstein, Jan-Henrik Haunert, Herman Haverkort, Benedikt Kolbe, Philip Mayer, Petra Mutzel, Alexander Naumann, Jonas Sauer. To appear in: Proceedings of the 34th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA'26), Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, 2026. Background These instances are derived from a real-world application: polygon aggregation for map simplification. Given is a set $P$ of building footprints, represented as 2D polygons. The objective is to find a set $S$ of interior-disjoint representative regions, such that each polygon in $P$ is fully contained in a region of $S$. We are interested in a solution that minimizes the objective function $g_\alpha(S) = A(S) + \alpha \cdot P(S)$, where $A(S)$ and $P(S)$ are the total area and perimeter of the regions in $S$, respectively. The parameter $\alpha$ controls the trade-off between faithfulness to the input (represented by the area) and shape simplicity (represented by the perimeter). In a cartographic application, it can be thought of as the "zoom factor" -- the further we zoom out, the simpler we want the shapes to become. We distinguish between two variants of the problem, both for a fixed choice of $\alpha$: Subdivision-based: A subdivision $D$ of the plane (e.g., a constrained Delaunay triangulation) is supplied in advance, such that each polygon in $P$ appears as a cell of $D$. The solution must be constructed by selecting cells from $D$ to add to $P$. The problem is solved via a transformation to (s,t)-min-cut on an augmented geometric dual of $D$ (see any of the papers listed above for details). Unrestricted: No restrictions are made regarding the shape of $S$ -- the only conditions are that $P$ must be covered and that the objective function $g_\alpha(S)$ is minimized. Blank et al. show that in this variant, the polygons are connected by circular arcs of radius $\alpha$ that fulfill several other conditions. The arcs are chosen from a set of $O(n^2)$ candidates. The problem can then be solved optimally via a transformation to the subdivision-based case, where the subdivision $D$ is created by superimposing all $O(n^2)$ arcs. This yields a solution in polynomial time, although the subdivision is much more complex than the constrained Delaunay triangulation. The resulting instances have some similarities with grid-based computer vision max-flow instances, which are built using a similar geometric-dual construction: They are sparse and have short (s,t)-paths. However, unlike typical vision instances, they do not have a regular structure because they are derived from human settlement areas. Consequently, although all nodes (except for s and t) have low degrees, the degrees are not entirely uniform. For the unrestricted variant, the graph is highly detailed because it is derived from a geometric intersection process between many circular arcs. As a side note, a parametric version of the problem, where $\alpha$ is not fixed, has also been studied. Here, the objective is to find an optimal solution for every possible value of $\alpha$. Beines et al. show that, with an equivalent reformulation of the objective function $g_\alpha$, this is a monotone parametric min-cut problem. The instances in this dataset are not parametric, but parametric instances can be found here. Contents The dataset is split into two groups, depending on how the subdivision was built: triangulations: Using a constrained Delaunay triangulation, as proposed by Rottmann et al. The instances are cities of varying sizes (Bonn, Cologne, Berlin, Miami) and the entire German state of Saarland. For each instance, there are five copies, with the different $\alpha$ values 100, 500, 1000, 5000, and 25000. Note that the graph structure is the same for all copies; only the weights are different. arcs: Using the geometric intersection of the candidate arcs, as proposed by Blank et al. for the unrestricted variant. The instances represent the towns of Ahrem, Edendorf, Friesheim and Gerolstein in the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia. For each instance, there are four copies, with the different $\alpha$ values 100, 500, 1000, 5000. Note that for this variant, the graph size increases dramatically with $\alpha$. The arc capacities represent a weighted tradeoff between area and perimeter, measured in square decimeters (dm^2) and rounded to the nearest integer. The $\alpha$ parameter is also measured in decimeters. In the arcs instances, this corresponds to the radii of the circular arcs from which the subdivision is formed, e.g., $\alpha=5000$ represents arcs with radii of 500m. Data Sources Ahrem, Friesheim, Edendorf, Gerolstein, Bonn, Cologne: OpenStreetMap data from Geofabrik Saarland: OpenStreetMap data from Geofabrik Berlin, Miami: GHS-OBAT project Format The files follow the format from the first DIMACS implementation challenge. This is a text format in which each line is prefixed with a character that specifies the type of line. Lines starting with c are comments and should be ignored. The first non-comment line is the problem line: p max NODES ARCS Here, max is the problem type (max-flow/min-cut), NODES is the number of nodes in the network, and ARCS is the number of directed arcs. This is followed by two node descriptor lines:n IDT tn IDS s Here, IDT is the id of the sink node and IDS is the id of the source node. Note that in this format, node ids start at 1. Finally, there is an arc descriptor line for every directed arc in the network: a SRC DST C This specifies an arc from node SRC to DST with capacity C. Capacities with values of int32_max or more should be interpreted as infinite. Note that the format does not require that a reverse arc exists for every directed arc. If reverse arcs are required by your algorithm, you must ensure that missing arcs are added with capacity 0. Credits and Contact This dataset was created by two research groups at the University of Bonn: the geoinformation group headed by Prof. Dr. Jan-Henrik Haunert and the Computational Analytics group headed by Prof. Dr. Petra Mutzel. It is released under the MIT license. When using it, please cite the publications listed above. If you want to report problems or give feedback on the dataset, please contact Jonas Sauer ([email protected]).

An important thread in the study of data-stream algorithms focuses on settings where stream items are active only for a limited time. We introduce a new expiration model, where each item arrives with its own arbitrary expiration time. The special case where items expire in the order that they arrive, which we call consistent expirations, contains the classical sliding-window model of Datar, Gionis, Indyk, and Motwani [SICOMP 2002] and its timestamp-based variant of Braverman and Ostrovsky [FOCS 2007]. Our first set of results explores the expiration streaming model and presents algorithms for several fundamental problems, including approximate counting, uniform sampling, and weighted sampling by efficiently tracking active items without explicitly storing them all. Naturally, these algorithms have many immediate applications, e.g., to range counting. Our second and main set of results for the expiration model designs algorithms for the diameter and k-center problems, where items are points in a metric space. Our results significantly extend those known for the special case of sliding-window streams by Cohen-Addad, Schwiegelshohn, and Sohler [ICALP 2016], and obtain a strictly better approximation factor for the diameter in the important special case of high-dimensional Euclidean metrics. We develop new decomposition and coordination techniques along with a geometric dominance framework to filter out redundant points based on both temporal and spatial proximity.

In the (continuous) Euclidean k -center problem, given n points in ℝ d and an integer k , the goal is to find k center points in ℝ d that minimize the maximum Euclidean distance from any input point to its closest center. In this paper, we establish conditional lower bounds for this problem in constant dimensions in two settings. Parameterized by k : Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), we show that there is no f ( k ) n o ( k 1−1/ d ) -time algorithm for the Euclidean k -center problem. This result shows that the algorithm of Agarwal and Procopiuc [SODA 1998; Algorithmica 2002] is essentially optimal. Furthermore, our lower bound rules out any (1+ε)-approximation algorithm running in time ( k /ε) o ( k 1−1/ d ) n O (1) , thereby establishing near-optimality of the corresponding approximation scheme by the same authors. Small k : Assuming the 3-SUM hypothesis, we prove that for any ε>0 there is no O ( n 2−ε )-time algorithm for the Euclidean 2-center problem in ℝ 3 . This settles an open question posed by Agarwal, Ben Avraham, and Sharir [SoCG 2010; Computational Geometry 2013]. In addition, under the same hypothesis, we prove that for any ε > 0, the Euclidean 6-center problem in ℝ 2 also admits no O ( n 2−ε )-time algorithm. The technical core of all our proofs is a novel geometric embedding of a system of linear equations. We construct a point set where each variable corresponds to a specific collection of points, and the geometric structure ensures that a small-radius clustering is possible if and only if the system has a valid solution.

The Fréchet distance is a computational mainstay for comparing polygonal curves. The Fréchet distance under translation, which is a translation invariant version, considers the similarity of two curves independent of their location in space. It is defined as the minimum Fréchet distance that arises from allowing arbitrary translations of the input curves. This problem and numerous variants of the Fréchet distance under some transformations have been studied, with more work concentrating on the discrete Fréchet distance, leaving a significant gap between the discrete and continuous versions of the Fréchet distance under transformations. Our contribution is twofold: First, we present an algorithm for the Fréchet distance under translation on 1-dimensional curves of complexity n with a running time of $\mathcal{O}(n^{8/3} log^3 n)$. To achieve this, we develop a novel framework for the problem for 1-dimensional curves, which also applies to other scenarios and leads to our second contribution. We present an algorithm with the same running time of $\mathcal{O}(n^{8/3} \log^3 n)$ for the Fréchet distance under scaling for 1-dimensional curves. For both algorithms we match the running times of the discrete case and improve the previously best known bounds of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^4)$. Our algorithms rely on technical insights but are conceptually simple, essentially reducing the continuous problem to the discrete case across different length scales.

The fine-grained complexity of computing the Fréchet distance has been a topic of much recent work, starting with the quadratic SETH-based conditional lower bound by Bringmann from 2014. Subsequent work established largely the same complexity lower bounds for the Fréchet distance in 1D. However, the imbalanced case, which was shown by Bringmann to be tight in dimensions $d\geq 2$, was still left open. Filling in this gap, we show that a faster algorithm for the Fréchet distance in the imbalanced case is possible: Given two 1-dimensional curves of complexity $n$ and $n^α$ for some $α\in (0,1)$, we can compute their Fréchet distance in $O(n^{2α} \log^2 n + n \log n)$ time. This rules out a conditional lower bound of the form $O((nm)^{1-ε})$ that Bringmann showed for $d \geq 2$ and any $\varepsilon>0$ in turn showing a strict separation with the setting $d=1$. At the heart of our approach lies a data structure that stores a 1-dimensional curve $P$ of complexity $n$, and supports queries with a curve $Q$ of complexity~$m$ for the continuous Fréchet distance between $P$ and $Q$. The data structure has size in $\mathcal{O}(n\log n)$ and uses query time in $\mathcal{O}(m^2 \log^2 n)$. Our proof uses a key lemma that is based on the concept of visiting orders and may be of independent interest. We demonstrate this by substantially simplifying the correctness proof of a clustering algorithm by Driemel, Krivošija and Sohler from 2015.