Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jindong Tong

dblp:366/6608 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 67% Information theory · 18% Computational complexity · 16%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic programming
sample average approximation
1.622025
Non-Asymptotic and Non-Lipschitzian Bounds on Optimal Values in Stochastic Optimization Under Heavy Tails · ICML 2025
New Sample Complexity Bounds for Sample Average Approximation in Heavy-Tailed Stochastic Programming · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.912025
Non-Asymptotic and Non-Lipschitzian Bounds on Optimal Values in Stochastic Optimization Under Heavy Tails · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
heavy-tailed distribution
0.912025
Non-Asymptotic and Non-Lipschitzian Bounds on Optimal Values in Stochastic Optimization Under Heavy Tails · ICML 2025
Information theory › statistical inference
confidence bounds
0.912025
Non-Asymptotic and Non-Lipschitzian Bounds on Optimal Values in Stochastic Optimization Under Heavy Tails · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.912025
Non-Asymptotic and Non-Lipschitzian Bounds on Optimal Values in Stochastic Optimization Under Heavy Tails · ICML 2025
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.812024
New Sample Complexity Bounds for Sample Average Approximation in Heavy-Tailed Stochastic Programming · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic programming
0.812024
New Sample Complexity Bounds for Sample Average Approximation in Heavy-Tailed Stochastic Programming · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sample average approximation · 1.7diametrical risk minimization · 1.7regularization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Non-Asymptotic and Non-Lipschitzian Bounds on Optimal Values in Stochastic Optimization Under Heavy Tails
abstract
This paper focuses on non-asymptotic confidence bounds (CB) for the optimal values of stochastic optimization (SO) problems. Existing approaches often rely on two conditions that may be restrictive: The need for a global Lipschitz constant and the assumption of light-tailed distributions. Beyond either of the conditions, it remains largely unknown whether computable CBs can be constructed. In view of this literature gap, we provide three key findings below: (i) Based on the conventional formulation of sample average approximation (SAA), we derive non-Lipschitzian CBs for convex SP problems under heavy tails. (ii) We explore diametrical risk minimization (DRM)—a recently introduced modification to SAA—and attain non-Lipschitzian CBs for nonconvex SP problems in light-tailed settings. (iii) We extend our analysis of DRM to handle heavy-tailed randomness by utilizing properties in formulations for training over-parameterized classification models.
Jindong Tong, Johannes O. Royset
ICML1
2024 New Sample Complexity Bounds for Sample Average Approximation in Heavy-Tailed Stochastic Programming
abstract
This paper studies sample average approximation (SAA) and its simple regularized variation in solving convex or strongly convex stochastic programming problems. Under heavy-tailed assumptions and comparable regularity conditions as in the typical SAA literature, we show — perhaps for the first time — that the sample complexity can be completely free from any complexity measure (e.g., logarithm of the covering number) of the feasible region. As a result, our new bounds can be more advantageous than the state-of-the-art in terms of the dependence on the problem dimensionality.
Jindong Tong
ICML2