Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marzio Vallero
dblp:366/8315
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-1292-8140ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Emerging computing paradigms · 56% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 44% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Efficacy of Surface Codes in Compensating for Radiation Events in Superconducting Devices · SC 2024 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
quantum error correction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Efficacy of Surface Codes in Compensating for Radiation Events in Superconducting Devices · SC 2024 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › radiation effects
radiation-induced faults |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Efficacy of Surface Codes in Compensating for Radiation Events in Superconducting Devices · SC 2024 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Efficacy of Surface Codes in Compensating for Radiation Events in Superconducting Devices · SC 2024 |
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computing |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | On the Efficacy of Surface Codes in Compensating for Radiation Events in Superconducting Devices · SC 2024 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture › quantum error correction
surface code |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | On the Efficacy of Surface Codes in Compensating for Radiation Events in Superconducting Devices · SC 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fault injection · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | State of practice: Evaluating GPU performance of state vector and tensor network methodsabstractThe frontier of quantum computing (QC) simulation on classical hardware is quickly reaching the hard scalability limits for computational feasibility. Nonetheless, there is still a need to simulate large quantum systems classically, as the Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices are yet to be considered fault tolerant and performant enough in terms of operations per second. Each of the two main exact simulation techniques, state vector and tensor network simulators, boasts specific limitations. This article investigates the limits of current state-of-the-art simulation techniques on a test bench made of eight widely used quantum subroutines, each in different configurations, with a special emphasis on performance. We perform both single process and distributed scaleability experiments on a supercomputer. We correlate the performance measures from such experiments with the metrics that characterise the benchmark circuits, identifying the main reasons behind the observed performance trends. Specifically, we perform distributed sliced tensor contractions, and we analyse the impact of pathfinding quality on contraction time, correlating both results with topological circuit characteristics. From our observations, given the structure of a quantum circuit and the number of qubits, we highlight how to select the best simulation strategy, demonstrating how preventive circuit analysis can guide and improve simulation performance by more than an order of magnitude. Marzio Vallero, Paolo Rech, Flavio Vella |
Future Gener. Comput. Syst. | 1 |
| 2025 | European Test Symposium Teams: an Anniversary SnapshotabstractThe IEEE European Test Symposium (ETS) has been facilitating progress in electronic systems testing since its launch in 1996. On the occasion of its 30th anniversary, this collaborative paper gathers sections by 21 ETS teams to outline their influential ideas and milestones. Each team’s section highlights historical perspective, current research, frameworks and projects as well as forward-looking research agendas in the area of electronic-based circuits and systems testing, reliability, safety, security and validation. This anniversary summary documents how research of various ETS teams, exemplifying the test community, has been evolving and transitioning from concepts to practical standards and Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tools and flows. This legacy is a strong base to drive the next generation of advances in electronic systems testing. Maksim Jenihhin, Jaan Raik, Artur Jutman, Natalia Cherezova, Raimund Ubar, Liviu Miclea, Szilárd Enyedi, Iulia Stefan, Ovidiu Stan, Cosmina Corches, Zebo Peng, Petru Eles, Rolf Drechsler, S. Eggersglüß, Görschwin Fey, Andreas Glowatz, Daniel Tille, Georges Gielen, Anthony Coyette, Wim Dobbelaere, Ronny Vanhooren, Po-Yao Chuang, Erik Jan Marinissen, Giorgio Di Natale, M. Barragan, Paolo Maistri, S. Mir, Vatajelu I. Vatajelu, Paolo Bernardi 0002, Stefano Di Carlo, Paolo Prinetto, Matteo Sonza Reorda, Massimo Violante, Haralampos-G. D. Stratigopoulos, M. K. Michael, Stelios Neophytou, Stavros Hadjitheophanous, Kyriakos Christou, M. Skitsas, Alberto Bosio, Bastien Deveautour, Patrick Girard 0001, Marcello Traiola, Arnaud Virazel, Fernando Santos 0001, Angeliki Kritikakou, Gioele Casagranda, Marzio Vallero, Flavio Vella, Paolo Rech, Letícia Maria Veiras Bolzani, Milos Krstic, Marko S. Andjelkovic, Fabian Vargas 0001, Grigor Tshagharyan, Gurgen Harutunyan, Valery A. Vardanian, Samvel K. Shoukourian, Yervant Zorian, Jennifer Dworak, Kundan Nepal, Theodore W. Manikas, Mottaqiallah Taouil, Moritz Fieback, Anteneh Gebregiorgis, Rajendra Bishnoi, Said Hamdioui, Abhijit Chatterjee, Anurup Saha, Suhasini Komarraju, K. Ma, Chandramouli N. Amarnath, Mehdi Baradaran Tahoori, Mahta Mayahinia, Maryam Rajabalipanah, Katayoon Basharkhah, N. Nosrati, Zahra Jahanpeima, Zainalabedin Navabi, Hans-Joachim Wunderlich, Sybille Hellebrand |
ETS | 48 |
| 2024 | On the Efficacy of Surface Codes in Compensating for Radiation Events in Superconducting DevicesabstractReliability is fundamental for developing large-scale quantum computers. Since the benefit of technological advancements to the qubit’s stability is saturating, algorithmic solutions, such as quantum error correction (QEC) codes, are needed to bridge the gap to reliable computation. Unfortunately, the deployment of the first quantum computers has identified faults induced by natural radiation as an additional threat to qubits reliability. The high sensitivity of qubits to radiation hinders the large-scale adoption of quantum computers, since the persistence and area-of-effect of the fault can potentially undermine the efficacy of the most advanced QEC. In this paper, we investigate the resilience of various implementations of state-of-the-art QEC codes to radiation-induced faults. We report data from over 400 million fault injections and correlate hardware faults with the logical error observed after decoding the code output, extrapolating physical-to-logical error rates. We compare the code’s radiation-induced logical error rate over the code distance, the number and role in the QEC of physical qubits, the underlying quantum computer topology, and particle energy spread in the chip. We show that, by simply selecting and tuning properly the surface code, thus without introducing any overhead, the probability of correcting a radiation-induced fault is increased by up to 10%. Finally, we provide indications and guidelines for the design of future QEC codes to further increase their effectiveness against radiation-induced events. Marzio Vallero, Gioele Casagranda, Flavio Vella, Paolo Rech |
SC | 1 |