Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Quentin Capdepon
dblp:366/8981
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0009-5205-2367ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 77% Software maintenance and evolution · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Assessing the feasibility of Micro frontend architecture in native mobile app development · ASE 2024 |
Software maintenance and evolution › software modularity
modular architecture |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Assessing the feasibility of Micro frontend architecture in native mobile app development · ASE 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
case study · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Assessing the feasibility of Micro frontend architecture in native mobile app developmentabstractSince their introduction, mobile application development has become complex and now rivals web app development. The primary factor contributing to this complexity is their monolithic architecture: a mobile application is still deployed as a single unit. In contrast, web applications have adopted modular architectures such as Microservice or Micro FrontEnd (MFE). This last approach divides development into teams, each responsible for an MFE corresponding to a specific software feature. Our study examines the adoption of the MFE architecture on native mobile platforms. This paper discusses: i) how MFE can be adapted to current native mobile platforms; ii) the limitations of adapting MFE architecture on mobile; and iii) the challenges MFE introduces to mobile application development. Despite challenges in composing mobile MFEs post-deployment, our research highlighted maintaining a static development-side composite is feasible, albeit with a loss of flexibility. This allows team separation and independent feature development, though technological agnosticism isn't achieved. Quentin Capdepon, Nicolas Hlad, Benoît Verhaeghe, Abdelhak-Djamel Seriai |
ASE | 1 |