Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guangxing Huang
dblp:367/3260
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
High-performance computing · 35% Parallel and multicore computing · 28% Memory systems · 28% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
High-performance computing › large-scale training
large language model training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PipeOffload: Improving Scalability of Pipeline Parallelism with Memory Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Memory systems
memory optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PipeOffload: Improving Scalability of Pipeline Parallelism with Memory Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Parallel and multicore computing
pipeline parallelism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PipeOffload: Improving Scalability of Pipeline Parallelism with Memory Optimization · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Zero Bubble (Almost) Pipeline Parallelism · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › model parallelism
pipeline parallelism |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Zero Bubble (Almost) Pipeline Parallelism · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › model parallelism
pipeline scheduling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Zero Bubble (Almost) Pipeline Parallelism · ICLR 2024 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed training |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | PipeOffload: Improving Scalability of Pipeline Parallelism with Memory Optimization · ICML 2025 |
High-performance computing
large-scale training |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Zero Bubble (Almost) Pipeline Parallelism · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pipeline scheduling · 1.5gradient computation splitting · 1.5selective offload · 0.9memory offload strategy · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | PipeOffload: Improving Scalability of Pipeline Parallelism with Memory OptimizationabstractPipeline parallelism (PP) is widely used for training large language models (LLMs), yet its scalability is often constrained by high activation memory consumption as the number of in-flight microbatches grows with the degree of PP. In this paper, we focus on addressing this challenge by leveraging the under-explored memory offload strategy in PP. With empirical study, we discover that in the majority of standard configurations, at least half, and potentially all, of the activations can be offloaded with negligible overhead. In the cases where full overload is not possible, we introduce a novel selective offload strategy that decreases peak activation memory in a better-than-linear manner. Furthermore, we integrate memory offload with other techniques to jointly consider overall throughput and memory limitation. Our experiments proves that the per-device activation memory effectively reduces with the total number of stages, making PP a stronger alternative than TP, offering up to a 19\% acceleration with even lower memory consumption. Penghui Qi, Guangxing Huang |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | Zero Bubble (Almost) Pipeline ParallelismabstractPipeline parallelism is one of the key components for large-scale distributed training, yet its efficiency suffers from pipeline bubbles which were deemed inevitable. In this work, we introduce a scheduling strategy that, to our knowledge, is the first to successfully achieve zero pipeline bubbles under synchronous training semantics. The key idea behind this improvement is to split the backward computation into two parts, one that computes gradient for the input and another that computes for the parameters. Based on this idea, we handcraft novel pipeline schedules that significantly outperform the baseline methods. We further develop an algorithm that automatically finds an optimal schedule based on specific model configuration and memory limit. Additionally, to truly achieve zero bubble, we introduce a novel technique to bypass synchronizations during the optimizer step. Experimental evaluations show that our method outperforms the 1F1B schedule up to 15\% in throughput under a similar memory limit. This number can be further pushed to 30\% when the memory constraint is relaxed. We believe our results mark a major step forward in harnessing the true potential of pipeline parallelism. The source code based on Megatron-LM is publicly avaiable at \url{https://github.com/sail-sg/zero-bubble-pipeline-parallelism}. Penghui Qi, Guangxing Huang |
ICLR | 3 |