Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andreas Abildtrup Hansen
dblp:367/3906
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 72% Generative modeling · 19% Image recognition and object detection · 9% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › equivariance
equivariant representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Interpreting Equivariant Representations · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
latent representation analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Interpreting Equivariant Representations · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Interpreting Equivariant Representations · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › molecular generation
molecular graph generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Interpreting Equivariant Representations · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › equivariance › equivariant representation learning
rotation-equivariant representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Interpreting Equivariant Representations · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Interpreting Equivariant Representations · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
invariant projections · 0.8equivariant neural network · 0.8data augmentation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Interpreting Equivariant RepresentationsabstractLatent representations are extensively used for tasks like visualization, interpolation, or feature extraction in deep learning models. This paper demonstrates the importance of considering the inductive bias imposed by an equivariant model when using latent representations as neglecting these biases can lead to decreased performance in downstream tasks. We propose principles for choosing invariant projections of latent representations and show their effectiveness in two examples: A permutation equivariant variational auto-encoder for molecular graph generation, where an invariant projection can be designed to maintain information without loss, and for a rotation-equivariant representation in image classification, where random invariant projections proves to retain a high degree of information. In both cases, the analysis of invariant latent representations proves superior to their equivariant counterparts. Finally, we illustrate that the phenomena documented here for equivariant neural networks have counterparts in standard neural networks where invariance is encouraged via augmentation. Andreas Abildtrup Hansen, Anna Calissano, Aasa Feragen |
ICML | 1 |