Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abhimanyu Hans
dblp:367/3961
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 47% Image recognition and object detection · 20% Generative modeling · 20% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 50% Distributed systems · 50% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
machine-generated text detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
memorization mitigation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Be like a Goldfish, Don't Memorize! Mitigating Memorization in Generative LLMs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › open-vocabulary object detection
zero-shot object detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text · ICML 2024 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Democratizing AI: Open-source Scalable LLM Training on GPU-based Supercomputers · SC 2024 |
High-performance computing
large-scale training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Democratizing AI: Open-source Scalable LLM Training on GPU-based Supercomputers · SC 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Democratizing AI: Open-source Scalable LLM Training on GPU-based Supercomputers · SC 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › parallelization
parallel training |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Democratizing AI: Open-source Scalable LLM Training on GPU-based Supercomputers · SC 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
performance modeling · 1.5four-dimensional hybrid parallelism · 1.5pre-trained language model · 0.8next-token training objective · 0.8goldfish loss · 0.8contrastive language model scoring · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated TextabstractDetecting text generated by modern large language models is thought to be hard, as both LLMs and humans can exhibit a wide range of complex behaviors. However, we find that a score based on contrasting two closely related language models is highly accurate at separating human-generated and machine-generated text. Based on this mechanism, we propose a novel LLM detector that only requires simple calculations using a pair of pre-trained LLMs. The method, called *Binoculars*, achieves state-of-the-art accuracy without any training data. It is capable of spotting machine text from a range of modern LLMs without any model-specific modifications. We comprehensively evaluate *Binoculars* on a number of text sources and in varied situations. Over a wide range of document types, *Binoculars* detects over 90% of generated samples from ChatGPT (and other LLMs) at a false positive rate of 0.01%, despite not being trained on any ChatGPT data. Code available at https://github.com/ahans30/Binoculars. Abhimanyu Hans, Avi Schwarzschild, Valeriia Cherepanova, Hamid Kazemi, Aniruddha Saha, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geiping, Tom Goldstein |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Be like a Goldfish, Don't Memorize! Mitigating Memorization in Generative LLMsabstractLarge language models can memorize and repeat their training data, causing privacy and copyright risks. To mitigate memorization, we introduce a subtle modification to the next-token training objective that we call the goldfish loss. During training, a randomly sampled subsets of tokens are excluded from the loss computation. These dropped tokens are not memorized by the model, which prevents verbatim reproduction of a complete chain of tokens from the training set. We run extensive experiments training billion-scale LLaMA-2 models, both pre-trained and trained from scratch, and demonstrate significant reductions in extractable memorization with little to no impact on downstream benchmarks.
_Code and checkpoints: https://github.com/ahans30/goldfish-loss_ Abhimanyu Hans, John Kirchenbauer, Yuxin Wen, Neel Jain, Hamid Kazemi, Prajwal Singhania, Gowthami Somepalli, Jonas Geiping, Abhinav Bhatele, Tom Goldstein |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Democratizing AI: Open-source Scalable LLM Training on GPU-based SupercomputersabstractTraining and fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) with hundreds of billions to trillions of parameters requires tens of thousands of GPUs, and a highly scalable software stack. In this work, we present a novel four-dimensional hybrid parallel algorithm implemented in a highly scalable, portable, open-source framework called AxoNn. We describe several performance optimizations in AxoNN to improve matrix multiply kernel performance, overlap non-blocking collectives with computation, and performance modeling to choose performance optimal configurations. These have resulted in unprecedented scaling and peak flop/s (bf16) for training of GPT-style transformer models on Perlmutter (620.1 Petaflop/s), Frontier (1.381 Exaflop/s) and Alps (1.423 Exaflop/s). While the abilities of LLMs improve with the number of trainable parameters, so do privacy and copyright risks caused by memorization of training data, which can cause disclosure of sensitive or private information at inference time. We highlight this side effect of scale through experiments that explore “catastrophic memorization,” where models are sufficiently large to memorize training data in a single pass, and present an approach to prevent it. As part of this study, we demonstrate fine-tuning of a 405-billion parameter LLM using AxoNN on Frontier. Prajwal Singhania, Aditya K. Ranjan, John Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Neel Jain, Abhimanyu Hans, Manli Shu, Aditya Tomar, Tom Goldstein, Abhinav Bhatele |
SC | 8 |