Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fuying Ye
dblp:367/4076
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 33% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33% Language models and text generation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
explainable question answering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SEER: Facilitating Structured Reasoning and Explanation via Reinforcement Learning · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
multi-hop question answering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SEER: Facilitating Structured Reasoning and Explanation via Reinforcement Learning · ACL (1) 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
structured reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SEER: Facilitating Structured Reasoning and Explanation via Reinforcement Learning · ACL (1) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reward shaping · 0.8reinforcement learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | SEER: Facilitating Structured Reasoning and Explanation via Reinforcement LearningabstractElucidating the reasoning process with structured explanations from question to answer is crucial, as it significantly enhances the interpretability, traceability, and trustworthiness of question-answering (QA) systems.However, structured explanations demand models to perform intricately structured reasoning, which poses great challenges.Most existing methods focus on single-step reasoning through supervised learning, ignoring logical dependencies between steps.Moreover, existing reinforcement learning (RL) based methods overlook the structured relationships, underutilizing the potential of RL in structured reasoning.In this paper, we propose SEER, a novel method that maximizes a structure-based return to facilitate structured reasoning and explanation.Our proposed structure-based return precisely describes the hierarchical and branching structure inherent in structured reasoning, effectively capturing the intricate relationships between different reasoning steps.In addition, we introduce a fine-grained reward function to meticulously delineate diverse reasoning steps.Extensive experiments show that SEER significantly outperforms state-of-theart methods, achieving an absolute improvement of 6.9% over RL-based methods on En-tailmentBank, a 4.4% average improvement on STREET benchmark, and exhibiting outstanding efficiency and cross-dataset generalization performance.Our code is available at https://github.com/Chen-GX/SEER. Guoxin Chen, Kexin Tang, Chao Yang 0026, Fuying Ye, Yu Qiao 0001, Yiming Qian |
ACL (1) | 4 |