Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan
dblp:367/4943
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Language models and text generation · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 27% Vision and language · 18% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairI Tales: Evaluation of Fairness in Indian Contexts with a Focus on Bias and Stereotypes · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
multilingual evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Cross-Lingual Auto Evaluation for Assessing Multilingual LLMs · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › speech translation
multilingual speech translation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Building Large Scale Datasets and State-of-the-Art Automatic Speech Translation Systems for 14 Indian Languages · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can Vision-Language Models Evaluate Handwritten Math? · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
speech translation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards Building Large Scale Datasets and State-of-the-Art Automatic Speech Translation Systems for 14 Indian Languages · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness evaluation
stereotype bias evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FairI Tales: Evaluation of Fairness in Indian Contexts with a Focus on Bias and Stereotypes · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can Vision-Language Models Evaluate Handwritten Math? · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Finding Blind Spots in Evaluator LLMs with Interpretable Checklists · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › multilingual NLP
multilingual language resources |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | IndicLLMSuite: A Blueprint for Creating Pre-training and Fine-Tuning Datasets for Indian Languages · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | FairI Tales: Evaluation of Fairness in Indian Contexts with a Focus on Bias and Stereotypes · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computing education
automated assessment |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Can Vision-Language Models Evaluate Handwritten Math? · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmark construction · 1.7speech translation systems · 0.9dataset construction · 0.9perturbation-based evaluation · 0.8checklist-based evaluation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Cross-Lingual Auto Evaluation for Assessing Multilingual LLMsabstractSumanth Doddapaneni, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Dilip Venkatesh, Raj Dabre, Anoop Kunchukuttan, Mitesh M Khapra. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Sumanth Doddapaneni, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Dilip Venkatesh, Raj Dabre, Anoop Kunchukuttan, Mitesh M. Khapra |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | Can Vision-Language Models Evaluate Handwritten Math?abstractRecent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have opened new possibilities in automatic grading of handwritten student responses, particularly in mathematics. However, a comprehensive study to test the ability of VLMs to evaluate and reason over handwritten content remains absent. To address this gap, we introduce FERMAT, a benchmark designed to assess VLMs’ ability to detect, localize and correct errors in handwritten mathematical content. FERMAT spans four key error dimensions - computational, conceptual, notational, and presentation - and comprises over 2,200 handwritten math solutions derived from 609 manually curated problems from grades 7-12 with intentionally introduced perturbations. Using FERMAT we benchmark nine VLMs across three tasks: error detection, localization, and correction. Our results reveal significant shortcomings in current VLMs in reasoning over handwritten text, with Gemini-1.5-Pro achieving the highest error correction rate (77%). We also observed that some models struggle with processing handwritten content, as their accuracy improves when handwritten inputs are replaced with printed text or images. These findings highlight the limitations of current VLMs and reveal new avenues for improvement. We will release FERMAT and all the associated resources in the open-source to drive further research. Oikantik Nath, Hanani Bathina, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Mitesh M. Khapra |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2025 | FairI Tales: Evaluation of Fairness in Indian Contexts with a Focus on Bias and StereotypesabstractJanki Atul Nawale, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Janani D, Mansi Gupta, Danish Pruthi, Mitesh M Khapra. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Janki Nawale, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Janani D, Danish Pruthi, Mitesh M. Khapra |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | Towards Building Large Scale Datasets and State-of-the-Art Automatic Speech Translation Systems for 14 Indian LanguagesabstractAshwin Sankar, Sparsh Jain, Nikhil Narasimhan, Devilal Choudhary, Dhairya Suman, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Anoop Kunchukuttan, Mitesh M Khapra, Raj Dabre. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Ashwin Sankar, Sparsh Jain, Nikhil Narasimhan, Devilal Choudhary, Dhairya Suman, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Anoop Kunchukuttan, Mitesh M. Khapra, Raj Dabre |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2025 | MILU: A Multi-task Indic Language Understanding BenchmarkabstractSshubam Verma, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Vishwajeet Kumar, Rudra Murthy, Jaydeep Sen. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Sshubam Verma, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Vishwajeet Kumar, V. Rudra Murthy, Jaydeep Sen |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 2 |
| 2024 | IndicLLMSuite: A Blueprint for Creating Pre-training and Fine-Tuning Datasets for Indian LanguagesabstractMohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Priyam Mehta, Ananth Sankar, Umashankar Kumaravelan, Sumanth Doddapaneni, Suriyaprasaad B, Varun G, Sparsh Jain, Anoop Kunchukuttan, Pratyush Kumar, Raj Dabre, Mitesh M. Khapra. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Priyam Mehta, Ananth Sankar, Umashankar Kumaravelan, Sumanth Doddapaneni, Suriyaprasaad B, Varun Balan G, Sparsh Jain, Anoop Kunchukuttan, Raj Dabre, Mitesh M. Khapra |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | Finding Blind Spots in Evaluator LLMs with Interpretable ChecklistsabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly relied upon to evaluate text outputs of other LLMs, thereby influencing leaderboards and development decisions.However, concerns persist over the accuracy of these assessments and the potential for misleading conclusions.In this work, we investigate the effectiveness of LLMs as evaluators for text generation tasks.We propose FBI, a novel framework designed to examine the proficiency of Evaluator LLMs in assessing four critical abilities in other LLMs: factual accuracy, instruction following, coherence in long-form writing, and reasoning proficiency.By introducing targeted perturbations in answers generated by LLMs, that clearly impact one of these key capabilities, we test whether an Evaluator LLM can detect these quality drops.By creating a total of 2400 perturbed answers covering 22 perturbation categories, we conduct a comprehensive study using different evaluation strategies on five prominent LLMs commonly used as evaluators in the literature.Our findings reveal significant shortcomings in current Evaluator LLMs, which failed to identify quality drops in over 50% of cases on average.Singleanswer and pairwise evaluations demonstrated notable limitations, whereas reference-based evaluations showed comparatively better performance.These results underscore the unreliable nature of current Evaluator LLMs and advocate for cautious implementation in practical applications.Code and data are available at https://github.com/AI4Bharat/FBI. Sumanth Doddapaneni, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Sshubam Verma, Mitesh M. Khapra |
EMNLP | 2 |