Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yaoliang Wu

dblp:367/5875 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0001-7923-7689ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
log analysis
0.812024
Deep Learning or Classical Machine Learning? An Empirical Study on Log-Based Anomaly Detection · ICSE 2024
Software maintenance and evolution › log analysis
log-based anomaly detection
0.812024
Deep Learning or Classical Machine Learning? An Empirical Study on Log-Based Anomaly Detection · ICSE 2024
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud deployment model
distributed cloud
0.212024
Deep Learning or Classical Machine Learning? An Empirical Study on Log-Based Anomaly Detection · ICSE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep learning · 1.5classical machine learning · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Deep Learning or Classical Machine Learning? An Empirical Study on Log-Based Anomaly Detection
abstract
While deep learning (DL) has emerged as a powerful technique, its benefits must be carefully considered in relation to computational costs. Specifically, although DL methods have achieved strong performance in log anomaly detection, they often require extended time for log preprocessing, model training, and model inference, hindering their adoption in online distributed cloud systems that require rapid deployment of log anomaly detection service.
Boxi Yu, Qiuai Fu, Zhiqing Zhong, Haotian Xie, Yaoliang Wu, Yuchi Ma, Pinjia He
ICSE6