VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Liran Ringel
dblp:367/7044
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-5822-6856ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 42% Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Learning paradigms · 14% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
autoregressive generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Segment-Based Attention Masking for GPTs · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism › selective attention
masked attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Segment-Based Attention Masking for GPTs · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
prediction-powered inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Semi-Supervised Risk Control via Prediction-Powered Inference · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Semi-Supervised Risk Control via Prediction-Powered Inference · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
transformer attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Segment-Based Attention Masking for GPTs · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Semi-Supervised Risk Control via Prediction-Powered Inference · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semi-supervised calibration · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9conformal prediction · 0.9sequential classification · 0.8learn-then-test calibration · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Segment-Based Attention Masking for GPTsabstractCausal masking is a fundamental component in Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT) models, playing a crucial role during training.Although GPTs can process the entire user prompt at once, the causal masking is applied to all input tokens step-by-step, mimicking the generation process.This imposes an unnecessary constraint during the initial "prefill" phase when the model processes the input prompt and generates the internal representations before producing any output tokens.In this work, attention is masked based on the known block structure at the prefill phase, followed by the conventional token-by-token autoregressive process after that.For example, in a typical chat prompt, the system prompt is treated as one block, and the user prompt as the next one.Each of these is treated as a unit for the purpose of masking, such that the first tokens in each block can access the subsequent tokens in a non-causal manner.Then, the model answer is generated in the conventional causal manner.The Segment-by-Segment scheme entails no additional computational overhead.When integrated using a lightweight fine-tuning into already trained models such as Llama and Qwen, MAS quickly increases models' performances.Our code will be available at: https://github.com/shacharKZ/ MAS-Segment- Shahar Katz, Liran Ringel, Yaniv Romano, Lior Wolf |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | Semi-Supervised Risk Control via Prediction-Powered InferenceabstractThe risk-controlling prediction sets (RCPS) framework is a general tool for transforming the output of any machine learning model to design a predictive rule with rigorous error rate control. The key idea behind this framework is to use labeled hold-out calibration data to tune a hyper-parameter that affects the error rate of the resulting prediction rule. However, the limitation of such a calibration scheme is that with limited hold-out data, the tuned hyper-parameter becomes noisy and leads to a prediction rule with an error rate that is often unnecessarily conservative. To overcome this sample-size barrier, we introduce a semi-supervised calibration procedure that leverages unlabeled data to rigorously tune the hyper-parameter without compromising statistical validity. Our procedure builds upon the prediction-powered inference framework, carefully tailoring it to risk-controlling tasks. We demonstrate the benefits and validity of our proposal through two real-data experiments: few-shot image classification and early time series classification. Bat-Sheva Einbinder, Liran Ringel, Yaniv Romano |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2024 | Early Time Classification with Accumulated Accuracy Gap ControlabstractEarly time classification algorithms aim to label a stream of features without processing the full input stream, while maintaining accuracy comparable to that achieved by applying the classifier to the entire input. In this paper, we introduce a statistical framework that can be applied to any sequential classifier, formulating a calibrated stopping rule. This data-driven rule attains finite-sample, distribution-free control of the accuracy gap between full and early-time classification. We start by presenting a novel method that builds on the Learn-then-Test calibration framework to control this gap marginally, on average over i.i.d. instances. As this algorithm tends to yield an excessively high accuracy gap for early halt times, our main contribution is the proposal of a framework that controls a stronger notion of error, where the accuracy gap is controlled conditionally on the accumulated halt times. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness, applicability, and usefulness of our method. We show that our proposed early stopping mechanism reduces up to 94% of timesteps used for classification while achieving rigorous accuracy gap control. Liran Ringel, Regev Cohen, Daniel Freedman, Michael Elad, Yaniv Romano |
ICML | 1 |