Numeric optimization methods are widely utilized to tackle complex analog circuit sizing problems, where the challenges include expensive simulations, non-linearity, and high parameter dimensionality. However, the diverse characteristics exhibited by different circuits result in varied optimization landscapes, making it difficult to identify a single algorithm that consistently outperforms others across all problems. In this paper, we introduce a multi-algorithm interworking optimization framework, which achieves optimization superadditivity based on a pool of member algorithms and a powerful algorithm-interworking protocol. We propose a computing resource reallocation method, which employs multitask Gaussian process regression and portfolio optimization techniques, leading to flexible and prudent online adaption of member algorithms. To efficiently utilize the computing resources for local exploitation, an evaluation data broadcast strategy enables cooperativeness across member algorithms. Besides, algorithms with different modeling overheads are integrated time-adaptively via an asynchronous parallelization mechanism. Comparative experiments against state-of-the-art algorithmcombining tools and optimization algorithms demonstrate the superiority of the proposed optimization framework.

Recent advances in machine learning (ML) for automating analog circuit synthesis have been significant, yet challenges remain. A critical gap is the lack of a standardized evaluation framework, compounded by various process design kits (PDKs), simulation tools, and a limited variety of circuit topologies. These factors hinder direct comparisons and the validation of algorithms. To address these shortcomings, we introduced AnalogGym, an open-source testing suite designed to provide fair and comprehensive evaluations. AnalogGym includes 30 circuit topologies in five categories: sensing front ends, voltage references, low dropout regulators, amplifiers, and phase-locked loops. It supports several technology nodes for academic and commercial applications and is compatible with commercial simulators such as Cadence Spectre, Synopsys HSPICE, and the open-source simulator Ngspice. AnalogGym standardizes the assessment of ML algorithms in analog circuit synthesis and promotes reproducibility with its open datasets and detailed benchmark specifications. AnalogGym's user-friendly design allows researchers to easily adapt it for robust, transparent comparisons of state-of-the-art methods, while also exposing them to real-world industrial design challenges, enhancing the practical relevance of their work. Additionally, we have conducted a comprehensive comparison study of various analog sizing methods on AnalogGym, highlighting the capabilities and advantages of different approaches. AnalogGym is available in the GitHub repository1. The documentations are also available at2.

In this article, we propose a novel batch Bayesian and Gaussian process enhanced subspace derivative free optimization (DFO) method to solve high-dimensional and simulation-expensive analog circuit optimization problems. The existing optimization methods, such as Bayesian optimization and trust region-based DFO, suffer from under-fitting surrogate models in high-dimensional problems, which leads to inefficient optimization and suboptimal solutions. To address this issue, we propose a novel approach that integrates a batch Bayesian querying strategy for exploring the global design space and a Gaussian process (GP) enhanced subspace DFO method for exploiting promising regions in effective low-dimensional subspace. The GP is used to approximate the gradient pattern for subspace establishment, significantly enhancing the simulation efficiency. The selection of promising regions is based on an innovative region acquisition function that estimates the weighted local expected improvement. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated on real-life analog circuits, achieving${2.05\times - 17.65\times }$simulation number speedup and${1.37\times - 16.11\times }$runtime speedup compared with the state-of-the-art optimization methods.