Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matt Xiao

dblp:367/9491 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › soft errors
error injection
0.712023
Brief Industry Paper: Evaluating Robustness of Deep Learning-Based Recommendation Systems Against Hardware Errors: A Case Study · RTSS 2023
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
error mitigation
0.712023
Brief Industry Paper: Evaluating Robustness of Deep Learning-Based Recommendation Systems Against Hardware Errors: A Case Study · RTSS 2023
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors
0.712023
Brief Industry Paper: Evaluating Robustness of Deep Learning-Based Recommendation Systems Against Hardware Errors: A Case Study · RTSS 2023
Recommender systems
neural recommendation
0.212023
Brief Industry Paper: Evaluating Robustness of Deep Learning-Based Recommendation Systems Against Hardware Errors: A Case Study · RTSS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

error injection campaign · 1.3activation clipping · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Brief Industry Paper: Evaluating Robustness of Deep Learning-Based Recommendation Systems Against Hardware Errors: A Case Study
abstract
Deep learning-based recommendation systems (DL-RMs) are industry-scale recommendation models developed by Meta, designed to make use of both categorical and numerical inputs to make personalized recommendations. To serve billions of users in real-time, DLRMs rely on high-performance hardware and accelerators within our data centers, optimizing for execution latency and recommendation quality. However, continuous technology scaling, expanding workload, and increasing hardware heterogeneity could lead to increased risk of hardware errors. Addressing this risk often involves introducing extra design redundancy, which can pose a non-negligible overhead in performance and latency. In this paper, we present a case study of evaluating DLRM robustness against hardware errors by performing an extensive error injection campaign to DLRM. Our findings unveil that DLRM is notably robust to hardware errors and we further find that embedding tables in DLRM show an especially strong robustness. Additionally, we explore a software-level error mitigation techniques, activation clipping, for mitigating the hardware errors, which improves the DLRM robustness further. This industrial case study of understanding and improving DLRM robustness can enable the system to continue to deliver timely recommendations even in the presence of hardware challenges, or reduce the timing latency overhead posed by design redundancy, enhancing overall recommendation system performance.
Fan Fred Lin, Matt Xiao, Alban Desmaison, Sriram Sankar
RTSS3