VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jagrit Acharya
dblp:368/0400
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-0302-6130ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | BugsRepo: A Comprehensive Curated Dataset of Bug Reports, Comments and Contributors Information from BugzillaabstractBug reports help software development teams enhance software quality, yet their utility is often compromised by unclear or incomplete information. This issue not only hinders developers’ ability to quickly understand and resolve bugs but also poses significant challenges for various software maintenance prediction systems, such as bug triaging, severity prediction, and bug report summarization. To address this issue, we introduce BugsRepo, a multifaceted dataset derived from Mozilla projects that offers three key components to support a wide range of software maintenance tasks. Jagrit Acharya, Gouri Ginde |
EASE | 1 |
| 2025 | Can We Enhance Bug Report Quality Using LLMs?: An Empirical Study of LLM-Based Bug Report GenerationabstractBug reports contain the information developers need to triage and fix software bugs. However, unclear, incomplete, or ambiguous information may lead to delays and excessive manual effort spent on bug triage and resolution. In this paper, we explore whether Instruction fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) can automatically transform casual, unstructured bug reports into high-quality, structured bug reports adhering to a standard template. We evaluate three open-source instruction-tuned LLMs (Qwen 2.5, Mistral, and Llama 3.2) against ChatGPT-4o, measuring performance on metrics such as CTQRS, ROUGE, METEOR, and SBERT. Our experiments show that fine-tuned Qwen 2.5 achieves a CTQRS score of (77%), outperforming both fine-tuned Mistral (71%), Llama 3.2 (63%) and ChatGPT in 3-shot learning (75%). Further analysis reveals that Llama 3.2 shows higher accuracy of detecting missing fields particularly Expected Behavior and Actual Behavior, while Qwen 2.5 demonstrates superior performance in capturing Steps-to-Reproduce, with an F1 score of 76%. Additional testing of the models on other popular projects (e.g., Eclipse, GCC) demonstrates that our approach generalizes well, achieving up to 70% CTQRS in unseen projects’ bug reports. These findings highlight the potential of instruction fine-tuning in automating structured bug report generation, reducing manual effort for developers and streamlining the software maintenance process. Jagrit Acharya, Gouri Ginde |
EASE | 1 |