Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tyler Judd

dblp:368/3380 · also Tyler Earl Judd · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-5449-2840ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 70% Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 30%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Energy-efficient computing · 77% Distributed systems · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography
2.022026
Scalability Bottlenecks in Quantum-Resilient Distributed Ledgers: A Comparative Analysis of Post-Quantum Blockchain Implementations · HPDC 2026
The Energy Cost of Post-Quantum Transition: Benchmarking PQC Algorithms on Commodity Hardware · HPDC 2026
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › blockchain cryptography
post-quantum blockchain
1.012026
Scalability Bottlenecks in Quantum-Resilient Distributed Ledgers: A Comparative Analysis of Post-Quantum Blockchain Implementations · HPDC 2026
Distributed systems › distributed database
distributed ledger
0.312026
Scalability Bottlenecks in Quantum-Resilient Distributed Ledgers: A Comparative Analysis of Post-Quantum Blockchain Implementations · HPDC 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

comparative analysis · 2.0benchmarking · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 The Energy Cost of Post-Quantum Transition: Benchmarking PQC Algorithms on Commodity Hardware
abstract
The transition to quantum-resistant cryptography is becoming increasingly urgent as advances in quantum computing threaten widely deployed public-key systems such as RSA and elliptic-curve cryptography. While the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has recently standardized several post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) algorithms, there remains limited empirical data on their practical performance and energy characteristics on commodity hardware.
Krish Jindal, Tyler Judd, Suleyman Uludag
HPDC2
2026 Scalability Bottlenecks in Quantum-Resilient Distributed Ledgers: A Comparative Analysis of Post-Quantum Blockchain Implementations
abstract
Distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) form critical infrastructure for decentralized applications, yet their security relies heavily on classical asymmetric cryptographic primitives that are vulnerable to quantum attacks. Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) provides candidate algorithms designed to resist such threats, but integrating these schemes into operational blockchain systems introduces significant architectural and performance trade-offs.
Tyler Judd, Krish Jindal, Suleyman Uludag
HPDC1
2024 Coalescing Research into Modular and Safe Educational Cybersecurity Labs with AI Solutions
abstract
Driven by a cybercrime industry worth over $6 trillion, the demand for cybersecurity professionals is surging with a projected increase of over 35% in jobs over the next decade according to the US Department of Labor's BLS. Simultaneously, advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Data Science (DS), and Machine Learning (ML) are reshaping industries and cre-ating challenges, notably job displacement for the under-skilled. This research-to-practice full paper addresses the critical need to integrate AI/DS/ML into cybersecurity education to meet these evolving demands. We envision a marriage of AI/DS/ML and cybersecurity (ADM4CYB) through a research-to-education paradigm. Despite extensive research, there remains a significant lack of publicly accessible labs that apply AI, DS, and ML to real-world cyber-security challenges. As such, readily available, easy to adopt, modular, and hands-on labs applying AI/DS/ML solutions to cybersecurity problems are highly desirable. At this juncture, we are developing a methodology that enables instructors and researchers to transform their work into practical, safe, and interactive teaching labs, enhancing student learning across various cybersecurity topics. Our initiative aims to integrate AI, DS, and ML techniques into interactive labs to effectively address current cybersecurity challenges. These modular labs provide students with both theoretical knowledge and hands-on experience, essential for adapting to the rapidly evolving field. By creating accessible labs, our methodology empowers students to develop skills across various cybersecurity topics. We also report results of our preliminary evaluation after using the first lab from this methodology in two classes that show increased learning, heightened levels of interest and motivation in the fields of networking, cybersecurity, AI/DS/ML, as well as coding.
Tyler Judd, Halil Bisgin, Alvin Huseinovic, Mohammad Derani, Suleyman Uludag
FIE1
2024 Experience Implementing an Automated Assessment System for Accreditation
abstract
This innovative practice full paper introduces an automated assessment system, Michigan System of Automated Assessment for Accreditation (MSA3), designed for computing and engineering programs to meet both external accreditation and internal university requirements while minimally increasing faculty and staff workload. The system integrates with Canvas, enabling instructors to input assessment data directly during grading, streamlining the process by eliminating the need for separate data entry and report dissemination. Key features include automated data export and the generation of visual analytics, securely hosted on university servers. Additionally, the paper presents a preliminary study on how this system affects faculty attitudes towards the assessment workload required by ABET. Our preliminary survey results indicate a favorable perception by faculty, which should increase their buy-in and engagement with assessment, supporting assertions made in the literature. Our findings also suggest that the system may help align faculty efforts with accreditation demands more seam-lessly. Its code will be made available on GitHub, allowing for easy adaptation by other institutions using Canvas. Our future work includes increasing the level of automation, extending our methodology to other learning management systems, and conducting a larger evaluation to gauge MSA3's efficacy on the perception of the accreditation and faculty/staff buy-in.
Stephen W. Turner, Tyler Judd, Suleyman Uludag
FIE2