VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chansol Park
dblp:368/3905
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-9462-1783ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 75% Information extraction and text analysis · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
continual pre-training |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | HanjaBridge: Resolving Semantic Ambiguity in Korean LLMs via Hanja-Augmented Pre-Training · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
low-resource natural language understanding |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | HanjaBridge: Resolving Semantic Ambiguity in Korean LLMs via Hanja-Augmented Pre-Training · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | HanjaBridge: Resolving Semantic Ambiguity in Korean LLMs via Hanja-Augmented Pre-Training · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › ambiguity resolution
semantic disambiguation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | HanjaBridge: Resolving Semantic Ambiguity in Korean LLMs via Hanja-Augmented Pre-Training · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
knowledge distillation · 1.0hanja augmentation · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | HanjaBridge: Resolving Semantic Ambiguity in Korean LLMs via Hanja-Augmented Pre-TrainingabstractLarge language models (LLMs) often show poor performance in low-resource languages like Korean, partly due to unique linguistic challenges such as homophonous Sino-Korean words that are indistinguishable in Hangul script. To address this semantic ambiguity, we propose HanjaBridge, a novel meaning-injection technique integrated into a continual pre-training (CPT) framework. Instead of deterministically mapping a word to a single Hanja (Chinese character), HanjaBridge presents the model with all possible Hanja candidates for a given homograph, encouraging the model to learn contextual disambiguation. This process is paired with token-level knowledge distillation to prevent catastrophic forgetting. Experimental results show that HanjaBridge significantly improves Korean language understanding, achieving a 21% relative improvement on the KoBALT benchmark. Notably, by reinforcing semantic alignment between Korean and Chinese through shared Hanja, we observe a strong positive cross-lingual transfer. Furthermore, these gains persist even when Hanja augmentation is omitted at inference time, ensuring practical efficiency with no additional run-time cost. Seungho Choi, Sihyun Park, Minsang Kim, Chansol Park, Bongsu Kim |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2023 | Detecting Common Weakness Enumeration Through Training the Core Building Blocks of Similar Languages Based on the CodeBERT ModelabstractThe traditional code analysis approach to measure code quality, such as bad smells, coupling, cohesion, complexity, and common weakness enumeration, was a rule-based mechanism. In current, analyzing code through AI is being studied by many researchers. AI code analysis approach trains code patterns to AI model through labeled code datasets. The problem is that AI models require plenty of training datasets for better performance, but there are not enough datasets to train. To solve this problem, we suggest training an AI model with core building blocks of a target language and similar languages together. We can solve two problems the lack of datasets and the low performance of the AI model. Finally, we will compare the performance of the two models. One is a model trained with a dataset containing only one target language, and the other is a model trained with a dataset containing similar languages. Chansol Park, Robert Young Chul Kim |
APSEC | 1 |