Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sergio Orozco
dblp:368/8366
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 87% Motion planning and robot control · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robot Task Planning Under Local Observability · ICRA 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
task planning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robot Task Planning Under Local Observability · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
mobile robot task execution |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Robot Task Planning Under Local Observability · ICRA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
off-the-shelf markov planners · 0.8markov decision process · 0.8POMDP · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Robot Task Planning Under Local ObservabilityabstractReal-world robot task planning is intractable in part due to partial observability. A common approach to reducing complexity is introducing additional structure into the decision process, such as mixed-observability, factored states, or temporally-extended actions. We propose the locally observable Markov decision process, a novel formulation that models task-level planning where uncertainty pertains to object-level attributes and where a robot has subroutines for seeking and accurately observing objects. This models sensors that are range-limited and line-of-sight—objects occluded or outside sensor range are unobserved, but the attributes of objects that fall within sensor view can be resolved via repeated observation. Our model results in a three-stage planning process: first, the robot plans using only observed objects; if that fails, it generates a target object that, if observed, could result in a feasible plan; finally, it attempts to locate and observe the target, replanning after each newly observed object. By combining LOMDPs with off-the-shelf Markov planners, we outperform state-of-the-art-solvers for both object-oriented POMDP and MDP analogues with the same task specification. We then apply the formulation to successfully solve a task on a mobile robot. Max Merlin, Shane Parr, Neev Parikh, Sergio Orozco, Vedant Gupta, Eric Rosen, George Dimitri Konidaris |
ICRA | 4 |