Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sangdae Nam

dblp:369/3022 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multi-task inference
0.812024
Multi-Task Inference: Can Large Language Models Follow Multiple Instructions at Once? · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.212024
Multi-Task Inference: Can Large Language Models Follow Multiple Instructions at Once? · ACL (1) 2024
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Multi-Task Inference: Can Large Language Models Follow Multiple Instructions at Once?
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are typically prompted to follow a single instruction per inference call.In this work, we analyze whether LLMs also hold the capability to handle multiple instructions simultaneously, denoted as MULTI-TASK INFERENCE.For this purpose, we introduce the MTI BENCH (Multi-Task Inference Benchmark), a comprehensive evaluation benchmark encompassing 5,000 instances across 25 tasks.Each task in the MTI BENCH involves 2 to 3 sub-tasks.As expected, we first demonstrate that MULTI-TASK INFERENCE reduces the total inference time by ×1.46 times in average since it does not require multiple inference calls.Interestingly, contrary to the expectation that LLMs would perform better when tasks are divided, we find that state-ofthe-art LLMs, such as LLAMA-2-CHAT-70B and GPT-4, show up to 7.3% and 12.4% improved performance with MULTI-TASK INFER-ENCE compared to SINGLE-TASK INFERENCE on the MTI BENCH.We release the MTI BENCH dataset and our code at this link 1 .
Guijin Son, Sangwon Baek, Sangdae Nam, Ilgyun Jeong, Seungone Kim
ACL (1)3