Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Preston Zhu

dblp:369/3780 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 50% Information extraction and text analysis · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
discourse analysis
0.812024
Threads of Subtlety: Detecting Machine-Generated Texts Through Discourse Motifs · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
machine-generated text detection
0.812024
Threads of Subtlety: Detecting Machine-Generated Texts Through Discourse Motifs · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

recursive hypergraph · 0.8hierarchical parse tree · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Threads of Subtlety: Detecting Machine-Generated Texts Through Discourse Motifs
abstract
With the advent of large language models (LLM), the line between human-crafted and machine-generated texts has become increasingly blurred.This paper delves into the inquiry of identifying discernible and unique linguistic properties in texts that were written by humans, particularly uncovering the underlying discourse structures of texts beyond their surface structures.Introducing a novel methodology, we leverage hierarchical parse trees and recursive hypergraphs to unveil distinctive discourse patterns in texts produced by both LLMs and humans.Empirical findings demonstrate that, although both LLMs and humans generate distinct discourse patterns influenced by specific domains, human-written texts exhibit more structural variability, reflecting the nuanced nature of human writing in different domains.Notably, incorporating hierarchical discourse features enhances binary classifiers' overall performance in distinguishing between human-written and machine-generated texts, even on out-of-distribution and paraphrased samples.This underscores the significance of incorporating hierarchical discourse features in the analysis of text patterns.The code and dataset are available at https://github.com/ minnesotanlp/threads-of-subtlety.
Zae Myung Kim, Kwang Hee Lee, Preston Zhu, Vipul Raheja, Dongyeop Kang
ACL (1)3