Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ruben Weitzman
dblp:369/7179
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › protein variant effect prediction
protein fitness prediction |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Protriever: End-to-End Differentiable Protein Homology Search for Fitness Prediction · ICML 2025 ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis
protein bioinformatics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Protriever: End-to-End Differentiable Protein Homology Search for Fitness Prediction · ICML 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein sequence analysis
protein homology search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Protriever: End-to-End Differentiable Protein Homology Search for Fitness Prediction · ICML 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular property prediction
protein property prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ProteinNPT: Improving protein property prediction and design with non-parametric transformers · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vector search · 0.9end-to-end learning · 0.9differentiable retrieval · 0.9non-parametric transformers · 0.7deep mutational scanning · 0.7conditional sampling · 0.7benchmark evaluation · 0.7bayesian optimization · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Protriever: End-to-End Differentiable Protein Homology Search for Fitness PredictionabstractRetrieving homologous protein sequences is essential for a broad range of protein modeling tasks such as fitness prediction, protein design, structure modeling, and protein-protein interactions. Traditional workflows have relied on a two-step process: first retrieving homologs via Multiple Sequence Alignments (MSA), then training mod- els on one or more of these alignments. However, MSA-based retrieval is computationally expensive, struggles with highly divergent sequences or complex insertions & deletions patterns, and operates independently of the downstream modeling objective. We introduce Protriever, an end-to-end differentiable framework that learns to retrieve relevant homologs while simultaneously training for the target task. When applied to protein fitness prediction, Protriever achieves state-of-the-art performance compared to sequence-based models that rely on MSA-based homolog retrieval, while being two orders of magnitude faster through efficient vector search. Protriever is both architecture and task-agnostic, and can flexibly adapt to different retrieval strategies and protein databases at inference time – offering a scalable alternative to alignment-centric approaches. Ruben Weitzman, Peter Mørch Groth, Lood van Niekerk, Aoi Otani, Yarin Gal, Debora S. Marks, Pascal Notin |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and DesignabstractPredicting the effects of mutations in proteins is critical to many applications, from understanding genetic disease to designing novel proteins to address our most pressing challenges in climate, agriculture and healthcare. Despite an increase in machine learning-based protein modeling methods, assessing their effectiveness is problematic due to the use of distinct, often contrived, experimental datasets and variable performance across different protein families. Addressing these challenges requires scale. To that end we introduce ProteinGym v1.0, a large-scale and holistic set of benchmarks specifically designed for protein fitness prediction and design. It encompasses both a broad collection of over 250 standardized deep mutational scanning assays, spanning millions of mutated sequences, as well as curated clinical datasets providing high-quality expert annotations about mutation effects. We devise a robust evaluation framework that combines metrics for both fitness prediction and design, factors in known limitations of the underlying experimental methods, and covers both zero-shot and supervised settings. We report the performance of a diverse set of over 40 high-performing models from various subfields (eg., mutation effects, inverse folding) into a unified benchmark. We open source the corresponding codebase, datasets, MSAs, structures, predictions and develop a user-friendly website that facilitates comparisons across all settings. Pascal Notin, Aaron Kollasch, Daniel Ritter 0006, Lood van Niekerk, Steffanie Paul, Han Spinner, Nathan J. Rollins, Ada Shaw, Rose Orenbuch, Ruben Weitzman, Jonathan Frazer, Mafalda Dias, Dinko Franceschi, Yarin Gal, Debora S. Marks |
NeurIPS | 10 |
| 2023 | ProteinNPT: Improving protein property prediction and design with non-parametric transformersabstractProtein design holds immense potential for optimizing naturally occurring proteins, with broad applications in drug discovery, material design, and sustainability. However, computational methods for protein engineering are confronted with significant challenges, such as an expansive design space, sparse functional regions, and a scarcity of available labels. These issues are further exacerbated in practice by the fact most real-life design scenarios necessitate the simultaneous optimization of multiple properties. In this work, we introduce ProteinNPT, a non-parametric transformer variant tailored to protein sequences and particularly suited to label-scarce and multi-task learning settings. We first focus on the supervised fitness prediction setting and develop several cross-validation schemes which support robust performance assessment. We subsequently reimplement prior top-performing baselines, introduce several extensions of these baselines by integrating diverse branches of the protein engineering literature, and demonstrate that ProteinNPT consistently outperforms all of them across a diverse set of protein property prediction tasks. Finally, we demonstrate the value of our approach for iterative protein design across extensive in silico Bayesian optimization and conditional sampling experiments. Pascal Notin, Ruben Weitzman, Debora S. Marks, Yarin Gal |
NeurIPS | 2 |