VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ada Shaw
dblp:369/7672
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › protein variant effect prediction
protein fitness prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep mutational scanning · 0.7benchmark evaluation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and DesignabstractPredicting the effects of mutations in proteins is critical to many applications, from understanding genetic disease to designing novel proteins to address our most pressing challenges in climate, agriculture and healthcare. Despite an increase in machine learning-based protein modeling methods, assessing their effectiveness is problematic due to the use of distinct, often contrived, experimental datasets and variable performance across different protein families. Addressing these challenges requires scale. To that end we introduce ProteinGym v1.0, a large-scale and holistic set of benchmarks specifically designed for protein fitness prediction and design. It encompasses both a broad collection of over 250 standardized deep mutational scanning assays, spanning millions of mutated sequences, as well as curated clinical datasets providing high-quality expert annotations about mutation effects. We devise a robust evaluation framework that combines metrics for both fitness prediction and design, factors in known limitations of the underlying experimental methods, and covers both zero-shot and supervised settings. We report the performance of a diverse set of over 40 high-performing models from various subfields (eg., mutation effects, inverse folding) into a unified benchmark. We open source the corresponding codebase, datasets, MSAs, structures, predictions and develop a user-friendly website that facilitates comparisons across all settings. Pascal Notin, Aaron Kollasch, Daniel Ritter 0006, Lood van Niekerk, Steffanie Paul, Han Spinner, Nathan J. Rollins, Ada Shaw, Rose Orenbuch, Ruben Weitzman, Jonathan Frazer, Mafalda Dias, Dinko Franceschi, Yarin Gal, Debora S. Marks |
NeurIPS | 8 |