Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert Freund
dblp:37/3608
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Stochastic Frank-Wolfe for Constrained Finite-Sum Minimization · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
finite-sum optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Stochastic Frank-Wolfe for Constrained Finite-Sum Minimization · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › frank-wolfe algorithm
stochastic frank-wolfe |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Stochastic Frank-Wolfe for Constrained Finite-Sum Minimization · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Stochastic Frank-Wolfe for Constrained Finite-Sum Minimization · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic optimization · 0.9frank-wolfe · 0.9conditional gradient · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Stochastic Frank-Wolfe for Constrained Finite-Sum MinimizationabstractWe propose a novel Stochastic Frank-Wolfe (a. k. a. conditional gradient) algorithm for constrained smooth finite-sum minimization with a generalized linear prediction/structure. This class of problems includes empirical risk minimization with sparse, low-rank, or other structured constraints. The proposed method is simple to implement, does not require step-size tuning, and has a constant per-iteration cost that is independent of the dataset size. Furthermore, as a byproduct of the method we obtain a stochastic estimator of the Frank-Wolfe gap that can be used as a stopping criterion. Depending on the setting, the proposed method matches or improves on the best computational guarantees for Stochastic Frank-Wolfe algorithms. Benchmarks on several datasets highlight different regimes in which the proposed method exhibits a faster empirical convergence than related methods. Finally, we provide an implementation of all considered methods in an open-source package. Geoffrey Négiar, Gideon Dresdner, Alicia Y. Tsai, Laurent El Ghaoui, Francesco Locatello, Robert Freund, Fabian Pedregosa |
ICML | 6 |