Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Dino Franklin

dblp:37/3750 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › protein classification
protein sequence classification
0.112006
Application of a simple likelihood ratio approximant to protein sequence classification · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence alignment
0.112006
Application of a simple likelihood ratio approximant to protein sequence classification · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence similarity scoring
0.112006
Application of a simple likelihood ratio approximant to protein sequence classification · Bioinform. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

smith-waterman · 0.1local alignment kernel · 0.1compression-based distance · 0.1BLAST · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Application of a simple likelihood ratio approximant to protein sequence classification
abstract
MOTIVATION: Likelihood ratio approximants (LRA) have been widely used for model comparison in statistics. The present study was undertaken in order to explore their utility as a scoring (ranking) function in the classification of protein sequences. RESULTS: We used a simple LRA-based on the maximal similarity (or minimal distance) scores of the two top ranking sequence classes. The scoring methods (Smith-Waterman, BLAST, local alignment kernel and compression based distances) were compared on datasets designed to test sequence similarities between proteins distantly related in terms of structure or evolution. It was found that LRA-based scoring can significantly outperform simple scoring methods.
László Kaján, Attila Kertész-Farkas, Dino Franklin, Neli Ivanova, András Kocsor, Sándor Pongor
Bioinform.3