VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dino Franklin
dblp:37/3750
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › protein classification
protein sequence classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Application of a simple likelihood ratio approximant to protein sequence classification · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence alignment |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Application of a simple likelihood ratio approximant to protein sequence classification · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence similarity scoring |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Application of a simple likelihood ratio approximant to protein sequence classification · Bioinform. 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
smith-waterman · 0.1local alignment kernel · 0.1compression-based distance · 0.1BLAST · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Application of a simple likelihood ratio approximant to protein sequence classificationabstractMOTIVATION: Likelihood ratio approximants (LRA) have been widely used for model comparison in statistics. The present study was undertaken in order to explore their utility as a scoring (ranking) function in the classification of protein sequences. RESULTS: We used a simple LRA-based on the maximal similarity (or minimal distance) scores of the two top ranking sequence classes. The scoring methods (Smith-Waterman, BLAST, local alignment kernel and compression based distances) were compared on datasets designed to test sequence similarities between proteins distantly related in terms of structure or evolution. It was found that LRA-based scoring can significantly outperform simple scoring methods. László Kaján, Attila Kertész-Farkas, Dino Franklin, Neli Ivanova, András Kocsor, Sándor Pongor |
Bioinform. | 3 |