Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mahantesh Hosamani
dblp:37/3874
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Hardware security and side channels · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Services computing and microservices · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware security and side channels › hardware security primitives
hardware root of trust |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Tisa: Toward Trustworthy Services in a Service-Oriented Architecture · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2008 |
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Tisa: Toward Trustworthy Services in a Service-Oriented Architecture · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2008 |
Services computing and microservices
service-oriented architecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Tisa: Toward Trustworthy Services in a Service-Oriented Architecture · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
integrity verification · 0.2hardware root of trust · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Tisa: Toward Trustworthy Services in a Service-Oriented ArchitectureabstractVerifying whether a service implementation is conforming to its service-level agreements is important to inspire confidence in services in a service-oriented architecture (SoA). Functional agreements can be checked by observing the published interface of the service, but other agreements that are more non-functional in nature, are often verified by deploying a monitor that observes the execution of the service implementation. A problem is that such a monitor must execute in an untrusted environment. Thus, integrity of the results reported by such a monitor crucially depends on its integrity. We contribute an extension of the traditional SoA, based on hardware-based root of trust, that allows clients, brokers and providers to negotiate and validate the integrity of a requirements monitor executing in an untrusted environment. We make two basic claims: first, that it is feasible to realize our approach using existing hardware and software solutions, and second, that integrity verification can be done at a relatively small overhead. To evaluate feasibility, we have realized our approach using current software and hardware solutions. To measure overhead, we have conducted a case study using a collection of Web service implementations available with Apache Axis implementation. Hridesh Rajan, Mahantesh Hosamani |
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. | 2 |