Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Odile Laurent

dblp:37/4894 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › test generation
coverage-based test generation
0.112006
A methodology for automated test generation guided by functional coverage constraints at specification level · ASE 2006
Software testing › test generation
specification-based test generation
0.112006
A methodology for automated test generation guided by functional coverage constraints at specification level · ASE 2006
Software testing
test generation
0.112006
A methodology for automated test generation guided by functional coverage constraints at specification level · ASE 2006
Software testing
test coverage
0.012006
A methodology for automated test generation guided by functional coverage constraints at specification level · ASE 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

test generation tools · 0.1formal specification · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Towards Cross-Domains Model-Based Safety Process, Methods and Tools for Critical Embedded Systems: The CESAR Approach
Jean-Paul Blanquart, Eric Armengaud, Philippe Baufreton, Quentin Bourrouilh, Gerhard Grießnig, Martin Krammer, Odile Laurent, Joseph Machrouh, Thomas Peikenkamp, Cecile Schindler, Tormod Wien
SAFECOMP7
2010 Using Formal Methods and Testability Concepts in the Avionics Systems Validation and Verification (V&V) Process
abstract
Airbus has used formal methods for several years to specify avionics systems. Thanks to these methods, formal verification, testability concepts and automatic test case generation were explored and experimented on Airbus systems. This paper depicts the Airbus validation and verification process all along the system development cycle pointing out what kinds of static analysis and dynamic verification and validation activities are conducted. Then, we focus on innovative methods based on testing strategies for traceability purposes, testing design and fault isolation. Some considerations related to automatic test case generation are also discussed.
Odile Laurent
ICST1
2006 A methodology for automated test generation guided by functional coverage constraints at specification level
abstract
This paper presents an approach to automate test generation from a formal specification and a set of functional test objectives while taking into account coverage constraints at the specification level. We use existing test generation techniques and tools, our contribution is on the methodological side. We define an innovative approach adapted to the industrial domain and its constraints
Odile Laurent, Christel Seguin, Virginie Wiels
ASE1