VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
De-Sheng Wang
dblp:37/6216
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank |
0.2 | 3 | 2008 | Learning to rank relational objects and its application to web search · WWW 2008 Global Ranking Using Continuous Conditional Random Fields · NIPS 2008 Ranking with multiple hyperplanes · SIGIR 2007 |
Information retrieval › web search
topic distillation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Learning to rank relational objects and its application to web search · WWW 2008 |
Information retrieval
web search |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Learning to rank relational objects and its application to web search · WWW 2008 |
Information retrieval › ranking › learning to rank
ranking SVM |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Ranking with multiple hyperplanes · SIGIR 2007 |
Information retrieval › relevance feedback
pseudo-relevance feedback |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Learning to rank relational objects and its application to web search · WWW 2008 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Learning to rank relational objects and its application to web search · WWW 2008 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Ranking with multiple hyperplanes · SIGIR 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
relational learning · 0.1continuous conditional random fields · 0.1SVM-based optimization · 0.1support vector machine · 0.1divide-and-conquer · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Global Ranking Using Continuous Conditional Random FieldsabstractThis paper studies global ranking problem by learning to rank methods. Conventional learning to rank methods are usually designed for `local ranking', in the sense that the ranking model is defined on a single object, for example, a document in information retrieval. For many applications, this is a very loose approximation. Relations always exist between objects and it is better to define the ranking model as a function on all the objects to be ranked (i.e., the relations are also included). This paper refers to the problem as global ranking and proposes employing a Continuous Conditional Random Fields (CRF) for conducting the learning task. The Continuous CRF model is defined as a conditional probability distribution over ranking scores of objects conditioned on the objects. It can naturally represent the content information of objects as well as the relation information between objects, necessary for global ranking. Taking two specific information retrieval tasks as examples, the paper shows how the Continuous CRF method can perform global ranking better than baselines. Tao Qin 0001, Tie-Yan Liu, Xudong Zhang 0001, De-Sheng Wang, Hang Li 0001 |
NIPS | 4 |
| 2008 | Learning to rank relational objects and its application to web searchabstractLearning to rank is a new statistical learning technology on creating a ranking model for sorting objects. The technology has been successfully applied to web search, and is becoming one of the key machineries for building search engines. Existing approaches to learning to rank, however, did not consider the cases in which there exists relationship between the objects to be ranked, despite of the fact that such situations are very common in practice. For example, in web search, given a query certain relationships usually exist among the the retrieved documents, e.g., URL hierarchy, similarity, etc., and sometimes it is necessary to utilize the information in ranking of the documents. This paper addresses the issue and formulates it as a novel learning problem, referred to as, 'learning to rank relational objects'. In the new learning task, the ranking model is defined as a function of not only the contents (features) of objects but also the relations between objects. The paper further focuses on one setting of the learning problem in which the way of using relation information is predetermined. It formalizes the learning task as an optimization problem in the setting. The paper then proposes a new method to perform the optimization task, particularly an implementation based on SVM. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms the baseline methods for two ranking tasks (Pseudo Relevance Feedback and Topic Distillation) in web search, indicating that the proposed method can indeed make effective use of relation information and content information in ranking. Tao Qin 0001, Tie-Yan Liu, Xudong Zhang 0001, De-Sheng Wang, Wen-Ying Xiong, Hang Li 0001 |
WWW | 4 |
| 2008 | Query-level loss functions for information retrieval
Tao Qin 0001, Xudong Zhang 0001, Ming-Feng Tsai, De-Sheng Wang, Tie-Yan Liu, Hang Li 0001 |
Inf. Process. Manag. | 4 |
| 2008 | An active feedback framework for image retrieval
Tao Qin 0001, Xudong Zhang 0001, Tie-Yan Liu, De-Sheng Wang, Wei-Ying Ma, HongJiang Zhang |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 4 |
| 2007 | Ranking with multiple hyperplanesabstractThe central problem for many applications in Information Retrieval is ranking and learning to rank is considered as a promising approach for addressing the issue. Ranking SVM, for example, is a state-of-the-art method for learning to rank and has been empirically demonstrated to be effective. In this paper, we study the issue of learning to rank, particularly the approach of using SVM techniques to perform the task. We point out that although Ranking SVM is advantageous, it still has shortcomings. Ranking SVM employs a single hyperplane in the feature space as the model for ranking, which is too simple to tackle complex ranking problems. Furthermore, the training of Ranking SVM is also computationally costly. In this paper, we look at an alternative approach to Ranking SVM, which we call "Multiple Hyperplane Ranker" (MHR), and make comparisons between the two approaches. MHR takes the divide-and-conquer strategy. It employs multiple hyperplanes to rank instances and finally aggregates the ranking results given by the hyperplanes. MHR contains Ranking SVM as a special case, and MHR can overcome the shortcomings which Ranking SVM suffers from. Experimental results on two information retrieval datasets show that MHR can outperform Ranking SVM in ranking. Tao Qin 0001, Xudong Zhang 0001, De-Sheng Wang, Tie-Yan Liu, Hang Li 0001 |
SIGIR | 3 |
| 2007 | Topic distillation via sub-site retrieval
Tao Qin 0001, Tie-Yan Liu, Xudong Zhang 0001, De-Sheng Wang, Wei-Ying Ma |
Inf. Process. Manag. | 5 |