Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David A. Lee

dblp:37/6546 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-1794-2232ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › protein classification
protein family classification
0.212015
Functional classification of CATH superfamilies: a domain-based approach for protein function annotation · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein function prediction
0.212015
Functional classification of CATH superfamilies: a domain-based approach for protein function annotation · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics
0.012004
A structural perspective on genome evolution · RECOMB 2004
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
structural genomics
0.012004
A structural perspective on genome evolution · RECOMB 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hierarchical clustering · 0.2hidden markov model · 0.2structure comparison · 0.0sequence clustering · 0.0HMM profiles · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Functional classification of CATH superfamilies: a domain-based approach for protein function annotation
abstract
Bioinformatics (2015) 31(21):3460–3467. Author, Sayoni Das, would like to report a typographical error in Equation (2) in the above article.
Sayoni Das, David A. Lee, Ian Sillitoe, Natalie L. Willhoft, Jonathan G. Lees, Christine A. Orengo
Bioinform.2
2016 Novel Computational Protocols for Functionally Classifying and Characterising Serine Beta-Lactamases
abstract
Beta-lactamases represent the main bacterial mechanism of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics and are a significant challenge to modern medicine. We have developed an automated classification and analysis protocol that exploits structure- and sequence-based approaches and which allows us to propose a grouping of serine beta-lactamases that more consistently captures and rationalizes the existing three classification schemes: Classes, (A, C and D, which vary in their implementation of the mechanism of action); Types (that largely reflect evolutionary distance measured by sequence similarity); and Variant groups (which largely correspond with the Bush-Jacoby clinical groups). Our analysis platform exploits a suite of in-house and public tools to identify Functional Determinants (FDs), i.e. residue sites, responsible for conferring different phenotypes between different classes, different types and different variants. We focused on Class A beta-lactamases, the most highly populated and clinically relevant class, to identify FDs implicated in the distinct phenotypes associated with different Class A Types and Variants. We show that our FunFHMMer method can separate the known beta-lactamase classes and identify those positions likely to be responsible for the different implementations of the mechanism of action in these enzymes. Two novel algorithms, ASSP and SSPA, allow detection of FD sites likely to contribute to the broadening of the substrate profiles. Using our approaches, we recognise 151 Class A types in UniProt. Finally, we used our beta-lactamase FunFams and ASSP profiles to detect 4 novel Class A types in microbiome samples. Our platforms have been validated by literature studies, in silico analysis and some targeted experimental verification. Although developed for the serine beta-lactamases they could be used to classify and analyse any diverse protein superfamily where sub-families have diverged over both long and short evolutionary timescales.
David A. Lee, Sayoni Das, Natalie L. Willhoft, Dragana Dobrijevic, John Ward, Christine A. Orengo
PLoS Comput. Biol.1
2015 Functional classification of CATH superfamilies: a domain-based approach for protein function annotation
abstract
MOTIVATION: Computational approaches that can predict protein functions are essential to bridge the widening function annotation gap especially since <1.0% of all proteins in UniProtKB have been experimentally characterized. We present a domain-based method for protein function classification and prediction of functional sites that exploits functional sub-classification of CATH superfamilies. The superfamilies are sub-classified into functional families (FunFams) using a hierarchical clustering algorithm supervised by a new classification method, FunFHMMer. RESULTS: FunFHMMer generates more functionally coherent groupings of protein sequences than other domain-based protein classifications. This has been validated using known functional information. The conserved positions predicted by the FunFams are also found to be enriched in known functional residues. Moreover, the functional annotations provided by the FunFams are found to be more precise than other domain-based resources. FunFHMMer currently identifies 110,439 FunFams in 2735 superfamilies which can be used to functionally annotate>16 million domain sequences. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All FunFam annotation data are made available through the CATH webpages (http://www.cathdb.info). The FunFHMMer webserver (http://www.cathdb.info/search/by_funfhmmer) allows users to submit query sequences for assignment to a CATH FunFam. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Sayoni Das, David A. Lee, Ian Sillitoe, Natalie L. Willhoft, Jonathan G. Lees, Christine A. Orengo
Bioinform.2
2004 A structural perspective on genome evolution
abstract
At UCL we have developed several automated protocols for generating protein family resources (CATH; Gene3D). These resources can be used to perform comparative genome analyses in order to understand the evolution of protein families. Also to identify biologically and/or medically interesting families for which no structural data currently exists and which may therefore be important targets for structure genomics initiatives.The CATH domain structure database, established by Orengo and Thornton in 1993, now contains a significant proportion of protein structures from the PDB clustered into 1400 evolutionary families. Relationships have been identified using robust structure comparison methods (SSAP, CATHEDRAL). We have also benchmarked and optimised various 1D-profiles and HMM based protocols for assigning genome sequences to families within the resource (e.g. SAM-T99, SAMOSA, CATH-ISL).In this way we can assign structural data to a large proportion (up to 60%) of whole or partial sequences in completed genomes and >80% of genes coding for enzymes and other proteins in biochemical pathways. However, in order to include all families regardless of whether their structure is known or not, a new protein family resource has been developed (Gene3D). In Gene3D, complete genes have been clustered according to sequence similarity alone, using a robust clustering method (Pfscape). 120 completed genomes from all kingdoms have been clustered into 220,000 gene families, 70,000 of which contain 2 or more sequences. Subsequently, we have labelled those gene families for which CATH structural or Pfam functional domain annotations can be provided for all or part of the gene.Preliminary analysis of the genome annotations reveals that a significant proportion (up to 70%) of CATH annotated genes or gene regions in genomes are assigned to domain families that are common to all three kingdoms of life. However, only 20% of the genome sequences are assigned to gene families common to all kingdoms. Since a large proportion of these genes are multidomain proteins this supports the view that a great deal of functional diversity within the genomes has been achieved by combining domain modules in different ways.In collaboration with Professor Janet Thornton, we have analysed a subset of 56 bacterial genomes to determine the recurrence of specific domain structure families within the genomes. This revealed a small but essential group of universal, and in some cases, highly recurring domain families. For some size-dependent families, domain recurrence is highly correlated with increase in genome size, whilst in other size-independent families no correlation is observed. Statistical analysis allowed us to distinguish three groups. Within the size-dependent families we differentiated two groups: linearly-distributed and non-linearly-distributed. Functional annotation using the COGs revealed that these domains were predominantly involved in metabolism and regulation, respectively. Whilst a third group of Evenly-distributed size independent domains are primarily involved in protein translation and biosynthesis.By mapping CATH and Pfam domains families onto all the genome sequences in Gene3D we observe that a few hundred highly recurrent families are dominating at least 50% of whole or partial genome sequences. Many of these families are common to both prokaryotes and eukaryotes and are performing essential generic functions. In many of the largest families, significant divergence in sequence has been accompanied by modifications in structure and function. Targetting representatives in these families for structure determination will allow the structure genomics initiatives to map both fold and function space and reveal the mechanisms by which divergence in protein families promotes evolution of new functions.
David A. Lee, Alastair Grant, Ian Sillitoe, Mark Dibley, Juan Garcia Ranea, Christine A. Orengo
RECOMB1