Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Bolin

dblp:37/8019 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
1.422025
Linear cost and exponentially convergent approximation of Gaussian Matérn processes on intervals · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Efficient methods for Gaussian Markov random fields under sparse linear constraints · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization › approximation theory
rational approximation
0.912025
Linear cost and exponentially convergent approximation of Gaussian Matérn processes on intervals · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
constrained gaussian process
0.512021
Efficient methods for Gaussian Markov random fields under sparse linear constraints · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
gaussian graphical model
0.512021
Efficient methods for Gaussian Markov random fields under sparse linear constraints · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression
0.512021
Efficient methods for Gaussian Markov random fields under sparse linear constraints · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rational approximation · 1.7gaussian markov process · 1.7stochastic partial differential equation · 1.0basis transformation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Linear cost and exponentially convergent approximation of Gaussian Matérn processes on intervals
abstract
The computational cost for inference and prediction of statistical models based on Gaussian processes with Matérn covariance functions scales cubically with the number of observations, limiting their applicability to large data sets. The cost can be reduced in certain special cases, but there are no generally applicable exact methods with linear cost. Several approximate methods have been introduced to reduce the cost, but most lack theoretical guarantees for accuracy. We consider Gaussian processes on bounded intervals with Matérn covariance functions and, for the first time, develop a generally applicable method with linear cost and a covariance error that decreases exponentially fast in the order $m$ of the proposed approximation. The method is based on an optimal rational approximation of the spectral density and results in an approximation that can be represented as a sum of $m$ independent Gaussian Markov processes, facilitating usage in general software for statistical inference. Besides theoretical justifications, we demonstrate accuracy empirically through carefully designed simulation studies, which show that the method outperforms state-of-the-art alternatives in accuracy for fixed computational cost in tasks like Gaussian process regression.
David Bolin, Vaibhav Mehandiratta, Alexandre B. Simas
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2021 Efficient methods for Gaussian Markov random fields under sparse linear constraints
abstract
Methods for inference and simulation of linearly constrained Gaussian Markov Random Fields (GMRF) are computationally prohibitive when the number of constraints is large. In some cases, such as for intrinsic GMRFs, they may even be unfeasible. We propose a new class of methods to overcome these challenges in the common case of sparse constraints, where one has a large number of constraints and each only involves a few elements. Our methods rely on a basis transformation into blocks of constrained versus non-constrained subspaces, and we show that the methods greatly outperform existing alternatives in terms of computational cost. By combining the proposed methods with the stochastic partial differential equation approach for Gaussian random fields, we also show how to formulate Gaussian process regression with linear constraints in a GMRF setting to reduce computational cost. This is illustrated in two applications with simulated data.
David Bolin, Jonas Wallin
NeurIPS1
2016 Modeling the Polarimetric mm-Wave Propagation Channel Using Censored Measurements
abstract
This paper presents results based on polarimetric radio channel measurements at 60 GHz in a small room and in an empty, unfurnished, medium-sized room. The measurements in the small meeting room were performed using dual-polarized virtual antenna array elements at both the transmitter and receiver sides and includes LOS and NLOS scenarios. In the unfurnished room, a directional horn antenna was scanned in the azimuth plane and the Rx antenna was an omnidirectional antenna. Based on these measurements, the paper presents experimental parameter estimates for a novel model of the polarimetric propagation paths, that includes the power-decay as well as a correlated fading for the different polarization components. This work also includes an estimation method that takes measurement limitations caused by the noise floor and the limited cross-polarization discrimination of the antennas into account using censored samples.
Carl Gustafson, David Bolin, Fredrik Tufvesson
GLOBECOM2