Wenhui Cheng

dblp:371/0027 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 54% Energy systems and smart grids · 25% Computational finance and economics · 22%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Spatial and temporal data management · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Smart cities and intelligent transportation › demand prediction
cross-city demand prediction
0.912025
Breaking 'Chicken-Egg': Cross-city Battery Swap Demand Prediction via Knowledge-guided Diffusion · INFOCOM 2025
Energy systems and smart grids
electric vehicle
0.912025
Breaking 'Chicken-Egg': Cross-city Battery Swap Demand Prediction via Knowledge-guided Diffusion · INFOCOM 2025
Computational finance and economics › mechanism design
incentive design
0.812024
LSTAloc: A Driver-Oriented Incentive Mechanism for Mobility-on-Demand Vehicular Crowdsensing Market · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024
Smart cities and intelligent transportation › urban sensing
vehicular crowdsensing
0.812024
LSTAloc: A Driver-Oriented Incentive Mechanism for Mobility-on-Demand Vehicular Crowdsensing Market · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
incentive mechanism design
0.812024
LSTAloc: A Driver-Oriented Incentive Mechanism for Mobility-on-Demand Vehicular Crowdsensing Market · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › resource allocation
task allocation
0.812024
LSTAloc: A Driver-Oriented Incentive Mechanism for Mobility-on-Demand Vehicular Crowdsensing Market · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024
Smart cities and intelligent transportation › electric vehicle charging infrastructure
electric vehicle infrastructure
0.312025
Breaking 'Chicken-Egg': Cross-city Battery Swap Demand Prediction via Knowledge-guided Diffusion · INFOCOM 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

submodular optimization · 2.3large-scale dataset analysis · 2.3driver survey · 2.3knowledge guidance · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Breaking 'Chicken-Egg': Cross-city Battery Swap Demand Prediction via Knowledge-guided Diffusion
Wenhui Cheng, Chaocan Xiang, Dehua Liu, Tao Xiang 0001
INFOCOM1
2025 Attention mechanism and discrepancy metric based conditional adversarial network
Wei Wang 0077, Juncheng Lian, Wenhui Cheng
Knowl. Based Syst.5
2024 Balancing Electric Scooter Battery Swapping Network by Spatio-Temporal Recommendation
abstract
As a promising battery-sharing service, battery swapping has become one of the most important electric-scooter (called e-scooter) energy refueling mechanisms. However, by analyzing a battery swapping dataset of 108,574 e-scooter drivers and 41,358 batteries and surveying 224 of these drivers, we find that drivers are facing insufficient energy replenishment during the battery swapping process, i.e., swapping out an undercharged battery from the battery swapping station. To identify the root cause, we perform a data-driven analysis and reveal an imbalance in spatial and temporal swapping behavior patterns, which causes a significant decrease in battery charging time. Inspired by these findings, we design iSwap, a novel spatio-temporal battery swapping recommendation system, which improves drivers’ swapping experience by proactively coordinating spatio-temporal unbalanced behavior patterns. iSwap considers not only drivers’ individual temporal preference for swapping time recommendation (i.e., when to swap) but also the complex mutual influence among drivers for swapping station recommendation (i.e., where to swap). To perform the two tasks efficiently, we propose a swapping behavior-aware phase demand balancing schema and a submodularity-based near-optimal swapping station recommendation algorithm. Finally, through the evaluation, iSwap improves the probability of swapping out a fully charged battery by 42.1% and driver satisfaction by 16.8% compared to the ground truth.
Enyi Zhou, Zhenghan Li, Dehua Liu, Chaocan Xiang, Wenhui Cheng
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.6
2024 LSTAloc: A Driver-Oriented Incentive Mechanism for Mobility-on-Demand Vehicular Crowdsensing Market
abstract
With the popularity of Mobility-on-Demand (MOD) vehicles, a new market called MOD-Vehicular-Crowdsensing (MOVE-CS) was introduced for drivers to earn more by collecting road data. Unfortunately, MOVE-CS failed after two years of operation. To identify the root cause, we survey 581 drivers and reveal its simple incentive model based on blindly competitive rewards. This model brings most drivers few yields, resulting in their withdrawals. In contrast, a similar market termed MOD-Human-Crowdsensing (MOMAN-CS) remains successful thanks to a complex model based on exclusively customized rewards. Hence, we wonder whether MOVE-CS can be resurrected by learning from MOMAN-CS. Despite considerable similarity, we can hardly apply the incentive model of MOMAN-CS to MOVE-CS, since MOD drivers are also concerned with passenger missions that dominate their earnings. To this end, we analyze a large-scale dataset of 12,493 MOD vehicles, finding that drivers have explicit preference for short-term, immediate gains as well as implicit rationality in pursuit of long-term, stable profits. Therefore, we design a novel driver-oriented incentive mechanism for MOVE-CS, calledLSTAloc, at the heart of which lies a spatial-temporal differentiation-aware task allocation scheme empowered by submodular optimization. Applied to the dataset, our design would essentially benefit both the drivers and platform to incentivize MOD vehicular crowdsensing efficiently, thus possessing the potential to resurrect MOVE-CS.
Chaocan Xiang, Wenhui Cheng, Chi Lin 0001, Xinglin Zhang 0001, Daibo Liu, Zhenhua Li 0001
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.2
2024 Marginal Effect-aware Multiple-Vehicle Scheduling for Road Data Collection: A Near-optimal Result
abstract
Vehicles equipped with abundant sensors offer a promising way for large-scale, low-cost road data collection. To realize this potential, a well-designed vehicle scheduling scheme is essential for deploying the recruited drivers efficiently. Nevertheless, existing works fail to consider the marginal effect among drivers’ collections. Different from them, this article introduces a, to the best of our knowledge, new multiple-vehicle scheduling problem that jointly optimizes task allocation and vehicle trajectory planning to maximize the overall collection utility by accounting for the marginal effect in drivers’ data collections. However, solving this problem is non-trivial due to its involvement with multiple coupled NP-hard problems. To this end, we propose MeSched, a marginal effect-aware multiple-vehicle scheduling scheme designed for road data collection. Specifically, we first present a greedy-based auxiliary graph construction method to disentangle the initial problem into multiple independent single-vehicle scheduling subproblems. Furthermore, we build an approximate surrogate function that transforms each subproblem into a tractable form involving only a single variable. The theoretical analysis proves that MeSched can achieve a 1-(1/ e ) ¼ -approximation ratio in polynomial time. Comprehensive evaluations based on a real-world trajectory dataset of 12,493 vehicles demonstrate that MeSched can significantly improve the collection utility by 104.5% on average compared with four baselines.
Wenhui Cheng, Zixian Jiang, Chaocan Xiang, Jianglan Fu
ACM Trans. Sens. Networks1