VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiaotian Ye
dblp:371/1109
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 62% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 14% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
knowledge editing |
2.6 | 3 | 2026 | Spectral Characterization and Mitigation of Sequential Knowledge Editing Collapse · ACL (1) 2026 Uncovering Overfitting in Large Language Model Editing · ICLR 2025 Knowledge Graph Enhanced Large Language Model Editing · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LLM Unlearning Should Be Form-Independent · SP 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LLM Unlearning Should Be Form-Independent · SP 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › knowledge editing
sequential model editing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Spectral Characterization and Mitigation of Sequential Knowledge Editing Collapse · ACL (1) 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › machine unlearning
LLM unlearning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LLM Unlearning Should Be Form-Independent · SP 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
machine unlearning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LLM Unlearning Should Be Form-Independent · SP 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Uncovering Overfitting in Large Language Model Editing · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Knowledge Graph Enhanced Large Language Model Editing · EMNLP 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge recall |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Uncovering Overfitting in Large Language Model Editing · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
training-free unlearning · 2.0rank-one concept redirection · 2.0spectral analysis · 1.0multi-stage inference constraint · 0.9in-context learning · 0.9knowledge graph augmentation · 0.8graph-based knowledge editing · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Spectral Characterization and Mitigation of Sequential Knowledge Editing CollapseabstractChi Zhang, Mengqi Zhang, Xiaotian Ye, Runxi Cheng, Zisheng Zhou, Ying Zhou, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Chi Zhang 0102, Mengqi Zhang 0002, Xiaotian Ye, Runxi Cheng, Zisheng Zhou, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2026 | LLM Unlearning Should Be Form-IndependentabstractLarge Language Model (LLM) unlearning aims to erase or suppress undesirable knowledge within the model, offering promise for controlling harmful or private information to prevent misuse. However, recent studies highlight its limited efficacy in real-world scenarios, hindering practical adoption. In this study, we identify a pervasive issue underlying many downstream failures: the effectiveness of existing unlearning methods heavily depends on the form of training samples and frequently fails to generalize to alternate expressions of the same knowledge. We formally characterize this problem as Form-Dependent Bias and systematically investigate its specific manifestation patterns across various downstream tasks. To quantify its prevalence and support future research, we introduce ORT, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the robustness of unlearning methods against variations in knowledge expression. Results reveal that Form-Dependent Bias is both widespread and severe among current techniques. We argue that LLM unlearning should be form-independent to address the endless forms of downstream tasks encountered in real-world security-critical scenarios. Towards this goal, we introduce Rank-one Concept Redirection (ROCR), a novel training-free method, as a promising solution path. ROCR performs unlearning by targeting the invariants in downstream tasks, specifically the activated dangerous concepts. It is capable of modifying model parameters within seconds to redirect the model's perception of a specific unlearning target concept to another harmless concept. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ROCR significantly improves unlearning effectiveness compared to traditional methods while generating highly natural outputs. Xiaotian Ye |
SP | 1 |
| 2025 | Uncovering Overfitting in Large Language Model EditingabstractKnowledge editing has been proposed as an effective method for updating and correcting the internal knowledge of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing editing methods often struggle with complex tasks, such as multi-hop reasoning. In this paper, we identify and investigate the phenomenon of Editing Overfit, where edited models assign disproportionately high probabilities to the edit target, hindering the generalization of new knowledge in complex scenarios. We attribute this issue to the current editing paradigm, which places excessive emphasis on the direct correspondence between the input prompt and the edit target for each edit sample. To further explore this issue, we introduce a new benchmark, EVOKE (EValuation of Editing Overfit in Knowledge Editing), along with fine-grained evaluation metrics. Through comprehensive experiments and analysis, we demonstrate that Editing Overfit is prevalent in current editing methods and that common overfitting mitigation strategies are ineffective in knowledge editing. To overcome this, inspired by LLMs’ knowledge recall mechanisms, we propose a new plug-and-play strategy called Learn the Inference (LTI), which introduce a Multi-stage Inference Constraint module to guide the edited models in recalling new knowledge similarly to how unedited LLMs leverage knowledge through in-context learning. Extensive experimental results across a wide range of tasks validate the effectiveness of LTI in mitigating Editing Overfit. Mengqi Zhang 0002, Xiaotian Ye, Qiang Liu 0006, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Knowledge Graph Enhanced Large Language Model EditingabstractLarge language models (LLMs) are pivotal in advancing natural language processing (NLP) tasks, yet their efficacy is hampered by inaccuracies and outdated knowledge.Model editing emerges as a promising solution to address these challenges.However, existing editing methods struggle to track and incorporate changes in knowledge associated with edits, which limits the generalization ability of postedit LLMs in processing edited knowledge.To tackle these problems, we propose a novel model editing method that leverages knowledge graphs for enhancing LLM editing, namely GLAME.Specifically, we first utilize a knowledge graph augmentation module to uncover associated knowledge that has changed due to editing, obtaining its internal representations within LLMs.This approach allows knowledge alterations within LLMs to be reflected through an external graph structure.Subsequently, we design a graph-based knowledge edit module to integrate structured knowledge into the model editing.This ensures that the updated parameters reflect not only the modifications of the edited knowledge but also the changes in other associated knowledge resulting from the editing process.Comprehensive experiments conducted on GPT-J and GPT-2 XL demonstrate that GLAME significantly improves the generalization capabilities of post-edit LLMs in employing edited knowledge. Mengqi Zhang 0002, Xiaotian Ye, Qiang Liu 0006, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen |
EMNLP | 2 |