Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xiangguo Lv

dblp:371/2865 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0003-5946-0351ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 62% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 19% Language models and text generation · 19%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
multimodal question answering
0.812024
RJUA-MedDQA: A Multimodal Benchmark for Medical Document Question Answering and Clinical Reasoning · KDD 2024
Medical and health informatics
clinical decision support
0.812024
Towards Automatic Evaluation for LLMs' Clinical Capabilities: Metric, Data, and Algorithm · KDD 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
clinical reasoning
0.212024
RJUA-MedDQA: A Multimodal Benchmark for Medical Document Question Answering and Clinical Reasoning · KDD 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.212024
Towards Automatic Evaluation for LLMs' Clinical Capabilities: Metric, Data, and Algorithm · KDD 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structural restoration annotation · 1.5standardized patients · 1.5large multimodal model · 1.5large language model · 1.5clinical pathway · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 RJUA-MedDQA: A Multimodal Benchmark for Medical Document Question Answering and Clinical Reasoning
abstract
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) have shown potential in various medical applications, such as Intelligent Medical Diagnosis. Although impressive results have been achieved, we find that existing benchmarks do not reflect the complexity of real medical reports and specialized in-depth reasoning capabilities. In this work, we establish a comprehensive benchmark in the field of medical specialization and introduced RJUA-MedDQA, which contains 2000 real-world Chinese medical report images poses several challenges: comprehensively interpreting imgage content across a wide variety of challenging layouts, possessing the numerical reasoning ability to identify abnormal indicators and demonstrating robust clinical reasoning ability to provide the statement of disease diagnosis, status and advice based on a collection of medical contexts. We carefully design the data generation pipeline and proposed the Efficient Structural Restoration Annotation (ESRA) Method, aimed at restoring textual and tabular content in medical report images. This method substantially enhances annotation efficiency, doubling the productivity of each annotator, and yields a 26.8% improvement in accuracy. We conduct extensive evaluations, including few-shot assessments of 5 LMMs which are capable of solving Chinese medical QA tasks. To further investigate the limitations and potential of current LMMs, we conduct comparative experiments on a set of strong LLMs by using image-text generated by ESRA method. We report the performance of baselines and offer several observations: (1) The overall performance of existing LMMs is still limited; however LMMs more robust to low-quality and diverse-structured images compared to LLMs. (3) Reasoning across context and image content present significant challenges. We hope this benchmark helps the community make progress on these challenging tasks in multi-modal medical document understanding and facilitate its application in healthcare. Our dataset will be publicly available for noncommercial use at https://github.com/Alipay-Med/medDQA_benchmark.git
Congyun Jin, Weixiao Ma, Yujiao Li, Yabo Jia, Yuliang Du, Tao Sun 0018, Jinjie Gu, Chenfei Chi, Xiangguo Lv, Fangzhou Li
KDD13
2024 Towards Automatic Evaluation for LLMs' Clinical Capabilities: Metric, Data, and Algorithm
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are gaining increasing interests to improve clinical efficiency, owing to their unprecedented performance in modelling natural language.Ensuring the reliable clinical applications, the evaluation of LLMs indeed becomes critical for better mitigating the potential risks, e.g., hallucinations.However, current evaluation methods heavily rely on labor-intensive human participation to achieve human-preferred judgements.To overcome this challenge, we propose an automatic evaluation paradigm tailored to assess the LLMs' capabilities in delivering clinical services, e.g., disease diagnosis and treatment.The evaluation paradigm contains three basic elements: metric, data, and algorithm.Specifically, inspired by professional clinical practice pathways, we formulate a LLM-specific clinical pathway (LCP) to define the clinical capabilities that a doctor agent should possess.Then, Standardized Patients (SPs) from the medical education are introduced as the guideline for collecting medical data for evaluation, which can well ensure the completeness of the evaluation procedure.Leveraging these steps, * Equal Contribution.
Fangzhou Li, Chenfei Chi, Shiwei Lyu, Xiangguo Lv, Liya Ma, Zhiqiang Zhang 0012, Jinjie Gu
KDD9