Elena Malnatsky

dblp:371/3203 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-4822-2944ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 A Hybrid Human-AI Content Generation Framework for Safe and Personalized Dialogic Learning with Children
Elena Malnatsky, Shenghui Wang 0001, Kuhu Sinha, Koen V. Hindriks, Mike Ligthart
AIED (3)1
2026 The Robot Bookworm: Fostering Children's Reading Motivation through Personalized Book Discussions
abstract
We present the Robot Bookworm, a multi-session intervention co-designed with children and educators to foster reading motivation through personalized book discussions. The robot assigned each child a personally fitting book and engaged them in pedagogically structured discussions, with personalized book-aligned dialogic content selectively generated offline by a language model and moderated by people to ensure safety. We compared a personalized book discussion condition with a book-neutral control in a four-session, large-scale user study in two primary schools (N = 101, 8-11 y.o.). The intervention significantly increased reader-book relatedness and reading enjoyment, particularly for children with below-ceiling baseline enjoyment, but had no effect on intrinsic motivation. At a one-year follow-up, the quantitative effects were not sustained. However, children reported perceived positive shifts in attitudes towards reading, which they attributed to the Robot Bookworm.
Elena Malnatsky, Sobhaan ul Husan, Kuhu Sinha, Sofie Veld, Rafaella van Nee, Daniël Wijnhorst, Shenghui Wang 0001, Koen V. Hindriks, Mike Ligthart
HRI1
2025 Towards Dialogic Education through Child-Robot Interaction: A Hybrid Child-Centered Framework
abstract
This paper presents ongoing doctoral research on Dialogic Educational Child-Robot Interaction (DECRI), focused on designing child-centered hybrid dialogue systems that combine dialogic pedagogical structure with the adaptive potential of LLMs.We propose a generalisable framework that facilitates personalized educational dialogues, and validate its feasibility in a study (N=101) aimed at enhancing reading motivation.The framework integrates pedagogically grounded, co-designed dialogue strategies with LLM capabilities to support meaningful personalization.Future directions include expanding to small-group settings, leveraging local LLMs for enhanced personalization, co-design, and early user model development, and developing AI-based validation tools.The overarching goal is to responsibly design DECRI tailored to each child, while maintaining pedagogical and developmental integrity.
Elena Malnatsky
IDC1
2025 Fitting Humor: Age-Based Personalization for Shaping Relatable Child-Robot Interactions
abstract
In this paper, we present a participatory design approach to age-based personalization for child-robot interaction. This is an important step towards social robots being effective across age groups. As a testbed for our approach, we used humor. Personalized humor is a powerful social motivator and is uniquely suited to build relatable and sustained child-robot interactions. Through a series of co-design workshops (n = 102 children), we identified humor concepts that fit the specific sense of humor for each of the four age groups (8–9, 9–10, 10–11, 11–12 y.o.), as well as humor concepts that resonated across these age groups. A user study showed that, overall, children found the interaction more amusing and a better fit for both their own sense of humor and that of their peer group when the robot used age-personalized humor compared to age-agnostic humor. The strength of the effects varied by age group, with the oldest group consistently scoring lower on the outcome measures, indicating that the design was not equally effective for all groups.
Elena Malnatsky, Mike Ligthart
HRI1