VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tobias Kreiman
dblp:371/4300
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 54% Representation and self-supervised learning · 27% Generative modeling · 19% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › model simulation › atomistic simulation
machine learning interatomic potential |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MLIP Arena: Advancing Fairness and Transparency in Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials via an Open, Accessible Benchmark Platform · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry › molecular simulation
molecular dynamics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Action-Minimization Meets Generative Modeling: Efficient Transition Path Sampling with the Onsager-Machlup Functional · ICML 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MLIP Arena: Advancing Fairness and Transparency in Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials via an Open, Accessible Benchmark Platform · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
goal-conditioned reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Foundation Policies with Hilbert Representations · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
structured representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Foundation Policies with Hilbert Representations · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
unsupervised reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Foundation Policies with Hilbert Representations · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Action-Minimization Meets Generative Modeling: Efficient Transition Path Sampling with the Onsager-Machlup Functional · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Action-Minimization Meets Generative Modeling: Efficient Transition Path Sampling with the Onsager-Machlup Functional · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
onsager-machlup action functional · 1.7force field evaluation · 1.7flow matching · 1.7density functional theory · 1.7denoising diffusion · 1.7latent space directional movement · 0.8hilbert representation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Action-Minimization Meets Generative Modeling: Efficient Transition Path Sampling with the Onsager-Machlup FunctionalabstractTransition path sampling (TPS), which involves finding probable paths connecting two points on an energy landscape, remains a challenge due to the complexity of real-world atomistic systems. Current machine learning approaches rely on expensive training procedures and under-utilize growing quantities of atomistic data, limiting scalability and generalization. Generative models of atomistic conformational ensembles sample temporally independent states from energy landscapes, but their application to TPS remains mostly unexplored. In this work, we address TPS by interpreting candidate paths as trajectories sampled from stochastic dynamics induced by the learned score function of generative models, namely denoising diffusion and flow matching. Under these dynamics, finding high-likelihood transition paths becomes equivalent to minimizing the Onsager-Machlup (OM) action functional, enabling us to repurpose pre-trained generative models for TPS in a zero-shot fashion. We demonstrate our approach on a Müller-Brown potential and several fast-folding proteins, where we obtain diverse, physically realistic transition pathways, as well as tetrapeptides, where we demonstrate successful TPS on systems not seen by the generative model during training. Our method can be easily incorporated into new generative models, making it practically relevant as models continue to scale and improve. Sanjeev Raja, Martin Sípka, Michael Psenka, Tobias Kreiman, Michal Pavelka, Aditi S. Krishnapriyan |
ICML | 4 |
| 2025 | MLIP Arena: Advancing Fairness and Transparency in Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials via an Open, Accessible Benchmark PlatformabstractMachine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have revolutionized molecular and materials modeling, but existing benchmarks suffer from data leakage, limited transferability, and an over-reliance on error-based metrics tied to specific density functional theory (DFT) references. We introduce MLIP Arena, a benchmark platform that evaluates force field performance based on physics awareness, chemical reactivity, stability under extreme conditions, and predictive capabilities for thermodynamic properties and physical phenomena. By moving beyond static DFT references and revealing the important failure modes of current foundation MLIPs in real-world settings, MLIP Arena provides a reproducible framework to guide the next-generation MLIP development toward improved predictive accuracy and runtime efficiency while maintaining physical consistency. The Python package and online leaderboard are available at https://github.com/atomind-ai/mlip-arena. Yuan Chiang, Tobias Kreiman, Christine Zhang, Matthew C. Kuner, Elizabeth Weaver, Ishan Amin, Hyunsoo Park, Yunsung Lim, Jihan Kim, Daryl Chrzan, Aron Walsh, Samuel M. Blau, Mark Asta, Aditi S. Krishnapriyan |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Foundation Policies with Hilbert RepresentationsabstractUnsupervised and self-supervised objectives, such as next token prediction, have enabled pre-training generalist models from large amounts of unlabeled data. In reinforcement learning (RL), however, finding a truly general and scalable unsupervised pre-training objective for generalist policies from offline data remains a major open question. While a number of methods have been proposed to enable generic self-supervised RL, based on principles such as goal-conditioned RL, behavioral cloning, and unsupervised skill learning, such methods remain limited in terms of either the diversity of the discovered behaviors, the need for high-quality demonstration data, or the lack of a clear adaptation mechanism for downstream tasks. In this work, we propose a novel unsupervised framework to pre-train generalist policies that capture diverse, optimal, long-horizon behaviors from unlabeled offline data such that they can be quickly adapted to any arbitrary new tasks in a zero-shot manner. Our key insight is to learn a structured representation that preserves the temporal structure of the underlying environment, and then to span this learned latent space with directional movements, which enables various zero-shot policy “prompting” schemes for downstream tasks. Through our experiments on simulated robotic locomotion and manipulation benchmarks, we show that our unsupervised policies can solve goal-conditioned and general RL tasks in a zero-shot fashion, even often outperforming prior methods designed specifically for each setting. Our code and videos are available at https://seohong.me/projects/hilp/ Seohong Park, Tobias Kreiman, Sergey Levine |
ICML | 2 |