Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher Ratigan

dblp:371/4965 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
classifier evaluation
0.912025
The VOROS: Lifting ROC Curves to 3D to Summarize Unbalanced Classifier Performance · AAAI 2025
Performance modeling and evaluation › statistical analysis
ROC analysis
0.912025
The VOROS: Lifting ROC Curves to 3D to Summarize Unbalanced Classifier Performance · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

volume under ROC surface · 0.9ROC surface · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 The VOROS: Lifting ROC Curves to 3D to Summarize Unbalanced Classifier Performance
abstract
While the area under the ROC curve is perhaps the most common measure that is used to rank relative performance of different binary classifiers, longstanding field folklore has noted that it can be a measure that ill-captures the benefits of different classifiers when either the actual class values or misclassification costs are highly unbalanced between the two classes. We introduce a new ROC surface, and the VOROS, a volume over this ROC surface, as a natural way to capture these costs, by lifting the ROC curve to 3D. Compared to previous attempts to generalize the ROC curve, our formulation provides also a simple and intuitive way to model the scenario when only ranges, rather than exact values, are known for possible class imbalance and misclassification costs.
Christopher Ratigan, Lenore Cowen
AAAI1