VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adin Aberbach
dblp:371/5697
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data integration and cleaning
entity resolution |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Multipartite Entity Resolution: Motivating a K-Tuple Perspective (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Data integration and cleaning › entity resolution
entity resolution evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Multipartite Entity Resolution: Motivating a K-Tuple Perspective (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
precision and recall metrics · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Multipartite Entity Resolution: Motivating a K-Tuple Perspective (Student Abstract)abstractEntity Resolution (ER) is the problem of algorithmically matching records, mentions, or entries that refer to the same underlying real-world entity. Traditionally, the problem assumes (at most) two datasets, between which records need to be matched. There is considerably less research in ER when k > 2 datasets are involved. The evaluation of such multipartite ER (M-ER) is especially complex, since the usual ER metrics assume (whether implicitly or explicitly) k < 3. This paper takes the first step towards motivating a k-tuple approach for evaluating M-ER. Using standard algorithms and k-tuple versions of metrics like precision and recall, our preliminary results suggest a significant difference compared to aggregated pairwise evaluation, which would first decompose the M-ER problem into independent bipartite problems and then aggregate their metrics. Hence, M-ER may be more challenging and warrant more novel approaches than current decomposition-based pairwise approaches would suggest. Adin Aberbach, Mayank Kejriwal, Ke Shen 0003 |
AAAI | 1 |