VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Donghyeon Ki
dblp:371/6169
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Generative modeling · 56% Reinforcement learning · 34% Motion planning and robot control · 9% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Prior-Guided Diffusion Planning for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 Adaptive Non-Uniform Timestep Sampling for Accelerating Diffusion Model Training · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Prior-Guided Diffusion Planning for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 Relaxed Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation for Improved Offline Policy Optimization · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion model training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive Non-Uniform Timestep Sampling for Accelerating Diffusion Model Training · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Prior-Guided Diffusion Planning for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
guided sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Prior-Guided Diffusion Planning for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
timestep sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive Non-Uniform Timestep Sampling for Accelerating Diffusion Model Training · CVPR 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Prior-Guided Diffusion Planning for Offline Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Relaxed Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation for Improved Offline Policy Optimization · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › off-policy evaluation
stationary distribution correction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Relaxed Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation for Improved Offline Policy Optimization · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variance reduction · 0.9non-uniform timestep sampling · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9behavior regularization · 0.9f-divergence regularization · 0.8conjugate function relaxation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Adaptive Non-Uniform Timestep Sampling for Accelerating Diffusion Model TrainingabstractAs a highly expressive generative model, diffusion models have demonstrated exceptional success across various domains, including image generation, natural language processing, and combinatorial optimization. However, as data distributions grow more complex, training these models to convergence becomes increasingly computationally intensive. While diffusion models are typically trained using uniform timestep sampling, our research shows that the variance in stochastic gradients varies significantly across timesteps, with high-variance timesteps becoming bottlenecks that hinder faster convergence. To address this issue, we introduce a non-uniform timestep sampling method that prioritizes these more critical timesteps. Our method tracks the impact of gradient updates on the objective for each timestep, adaptively selecting those most likely to minimize the objective effectively. Experimental results demonstrate that this approach not only accelerates the training process, but also leads to improved performance at convergence. Furthermore, our method shows robust performance across various datasets, scheduling strategies, and diffusion architectures, outperforming previously proposed timestep sampling and weighting heuristics that lack this degree of robustness. Myunsoo Kim, Donghyeon Ki, Seongwoong Shim, Byung-Jun Lee 0001 |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2025 | Prior-Guided Diffusion Planning for Offline Reinforcement LearningabstractDiffusion models have recently gained prominence in offline reinforcement learning due to their ability to effectively learn high-performing, generalizable policies from static datasets. Diffusion-based planners facilitate long-horizon decision-making by generating high-quality trajectories through iterative denoising, guided by return-maximizing objectives. However, existing guided sampling strategies such as Classifier Guidance, Classifier-Free Guidance, and Monte Carlo Sample Selection either produce suboptimal multi-modal actions, struggle with distributional drift, or incur prohibitive inference-time costs. To address these challenges, we propose \textbf{\textit{Prior Guidance}} (PG), a novel guided sampling framework that replaces the standard Gaussian prior of a behavior-cloned diffusion model with a learnable distribution, optimized via a behavior-regularized objective. PG directly generates high-value trajectories without costly reward optimization of the diffusion model itself, and eliminates the need to sample multiple candidates at inference for sample selection. We present an efficient training strategy that applies behavior regularization in latent space, and empirically demonstrate that PG outperforms state-of-the-art diffusion policies and planners across diverse long-horizon offline RL benchmarks. Our code is available at https://github.com/ku-dmlab/PG. Donghyeon Ki, JunHyeok Oh, Seongwoong Shim, Byung-Jun Lee 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Relaxed Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation for Improved Offline Policy OptimizationabstractOne of the major challenges of offline reinforcement learning (RL) is dealing with distribution shifts that stem from the mismatch between the trained policy and the data collection policy. Stationary distribution correction estimation algorithms (DICE) have addressed this issue by regularizing the policy optimization with f-divergence between the state-action visitation distributions of the data collection policy and the optimized policy. While such regularization naturally integrates to derive an objective to get optimal state-action visitation, such an implicit policy optimization framework has shown limited performance in practice. We observe that the reduced performance is attributed to the biased estimate and the properties of conjugate functions of f-divergence regularization. In this paper, we improve the regularized implicit policy optimization framework by relieving the bias and reshaping the conjugate function by relaxing the constraints. We show that the relaxation adjusts the degree of involvement of the sub-optimal samples in optimization, and we derive a new offline RL algorithm that benefits from the relaxed framework, improving from a previous implicit policy optimization algorithm by a large margin. Woosung Kim, Donghyeon Ki, Byung-Jun Lee 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |