Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Varun Ananth

dblp:371/6381 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 56% Deep learning architectures and training · 44%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
actor-critic methods
0.812024
Integrating Neural Pathways for Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning Models · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
biologically inspired learning
0.812024
Integrating Neural Pathways for Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning Models · AAAI 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
mass spectrometry data analysis
0.812024
A learned score function improves the power of mass spectrometry database search · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
peptide identification
0.812024
A learned score function improves the power of mass spectrometry database search · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
peptide-spectrum matching
0.812024
A learned score function improves the power of mass spectrometry database search · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics
0.812024
A learned score function improves the power of mass spectrometry database search · Bioinform. 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › sample efficiency
sample-efficient reinforcement learning
0.212024
Integrating Neural Pathways for Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning Models · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

percolator · 0.8neuroscience-inspired learning signals · 0.8machine learning · 0.8de novo peptide sequencing · 0.8advantage actor-critic · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Integrating Neural Pathways for Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning Models
abstract
Considering that the human brain is the most powerful, generalizable, and energy-efficient computer we know of, it makes the most sense to look to neuroscience for ideas regarding deep learning model improvements. I propose one such idea, augmenting a traditional Advantage-Actor-Critic (A2C) model with additional learning signals akin to those in the brain. Pursuing this direction of research should hopefully result in a new reinforcement learning (RL) control paradigm that can learn from fewer examples, train with greater stability, and possibly consume less energy.
Varun Ananth
AAAI1
2024 A learned score function improves the power of mass spectrometry database search
abstract
MOTIVATION: One of the core problems in the analysis of protein tandem mass spectrometry data is the peptide assignment problem: determining, for each observed spectrum, the peptide sequence that was responsible for generating the spectrum. Two primary classes of methods are used to solve this problem: database search and de novo peptide sequencing. State-of-the-art methods for de novo sequencing use machine learning methods, whereas most database search engines use hand-designed score functions to evaluate the quality of a match between an observed spectrum and a candidate peptide from the database. We hypothesized that machine learning models for de novo sequencing implicitly learn a score function that captures the relationship between peptides and spectra, and thus may be re-purposed as a score function for database search. Because this score function is trained from massive amounts of mass spectrometry data, it could potentially outperform existing, hand-designed database search tools. RESULTS: To test this hypothesis, we re-engineered Casanovo, which has been shown to provide state-of-the-art de novo sequencing capabilities, to assign scores to given peptide-spectrum pairs. We then evaluated the statistical power of this Casanovo score function, Casanovo-DB, to detect peptides on a benchmark of three mass spectrometry runs from three different species. In addition, we show that re-scoring with the Percolator post-processor benefits Casanovo-DB more than other score functions, further increasing the number of detected peptides.
Varun Ananth, Justin Sanders, Melih Yilmaz, Sewoong Oh, William Stafford Noble
Bioinform.1