Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Raghav Saboo
dblp:371/7381
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-8175-360XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 95% Knowledge graphs · 5% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
e-commerce search |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | Joint Optimization of Relevance and Engagement in Multi-Task Ranking for E-Commerce with Efficient LLM Supervision · SIGIR 2026 Applications of LLMs in E-Commerce Search and Product Knowledge Graph: The DoorDash Case Study · WSDM 2024 |
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Joint Optimization of Relevance and Engagement in Multi-Task Ranking for E-Commerce with Efficient LLM Supervision · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval › ranking › learning to rank
multi-task learning for ranking |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Joint Optimization of Relevance and Engagement in Multi-Task Ranking for E-Commerce with Efficient LLM Supervision · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval › ranking
search relevance |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Applications of LLMs in E-Commerce Search and Product Knowledge Graph: The DoorDash Case Study · WSDM 2024 |
Knowledge graphs › domain-specific knowledge graph
product knowledge graph |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Applications of LLMs in E-Commerce Search and Product Knowledge Graph: The DoorDash Case Study · WSDM 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.8multi-task learning · 1.0annotation generation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Joint Optimization of Relevance and Engagement in Multi-Task Ranking for E-Commerce with Efficient LLM SupervisionabstractOptimizing industrial search ranking models solely for user engagement signals often introduces systematic biases, prioritizing popular or price-anchored items that may not satisfy semantic intent. We present a production-scale multi-task ranking system that integrates semantic relevance as a primary optimization objective, enabling explicit and controllable relevance--engagement trade-offs. Our architecture employs an ordinal relevance head that predicts cumulative probabilities over relevance thresholds, preserving the inherent ordering of labels. These outputs are integrated with engagement heads through a unified value model scoring function, enabling systematic balancing of semantic quality and short-term behavioral signals. To provide high-quality supervision for this multi-task framework, we utilize fine-tuned lightweight Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate three-level ordinal relevance labels: irrelevant, moderately relevant, and highly relevant. We address challenges regarding label distribution sensitivity and ensure high alignment with human annotations to enable efficient labeling for over 100 million query--item pairs. Evaluation across offline metrics, including NDCG@10, and online A/B experiments demonstrates that our approach significantly improves semantic alignment while preserving core engagement objectives. Jiaqi Xi, Raghav Saboo, Martin Wang, Sudeep Das |
SIGIR | 3 |
| 2024 | Applications of LLMs in E-Commerce Search and Product Knowledge Graph: The DoorDash Case StudyabstractExtracting knowledge from unstructured or semi-structured textual information is essential for the machine learning applications that power DoorDash's search experience, and the development and maintenance of its product knowledge graph. Large language models (LLMs) have opened up new possibilities for utilizing their power in these areas, replacing or complementing traditional natural language processing methods. LLMs are also proving to be useful in the label and annotation generation process, which is critical for these use cases. In this talk, we will provide a high-level overview of how we incorporated LLMs for search relevance and product understanding use cases, as well as the key lessons learned and challenges faced during their practical implementation. Sudeep Das, Raghav Saboo, Chaitanya S. K. Vadrevu, Bruce Wang, Steven Xu |
WSDM | 2 |