Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xueqiang Xu

dblp:371/8950 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 47% Data mining · 41% Knowledge graphs · 12%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 50% Language models and text generation · 50%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting
0.912025
TELEClass: Taxonomy Enrichment and LLM-Enhanced Hierarchical Text Classification with Minimal Supervision · WWW 2025
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
0.912025
LogiCoL: Logically-Informed Contrastive Learning for Set-based Dense Retrieval · EMNLP 2025
Data mining › text mining › text classification
hierarchical text classification
0.912025
TELEClass: Taxonomy Enrichment and LLM-Enhanced Hierarchical Text Classification with Minimal Supervision · WWW 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
s3: You Don't Need That Much Data to Train a Search Agent via RL · EMNLP 2025
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.912025
TELEClass: Taxonomy Enrichment and LLM-Enhanced Hierarchical Text Classification with Minimal Supervision · WWW 2025
Information retrieval › search engines › semantic search
entity retrieval
0.312025
LogiCoL: Logically-Informed Contrastive Learning for Set-based Dense Retrieval · EMNLP 2025
Knowledge graphs
taxonomy
0.312025
TELEClass: Taxonomy Enrichment and LLM-Enhanced Hierarchical Text Classification with Minimal Supervision · WWW 2025
Knowledge graphs
taxonomy enrichment
0.312025
TELEClass: Taxonomy Enrichment and LLM-Enhanced Hierarchical Text Classification with Minimal Supervision · WWW 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

zero-shot prompting · 1.7reward design · 1.7reinforcement learning · 1.7large language model · 1.7data generation · 1.7data annotation · 1.7supervised contrastive learning · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 s3: You Don't Need That Much Data to Train a Search Agent via RL
abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems empower large language models (LLMs) to access external knowledge during inference.Recent advances have enabled LLMs to act as search agents via reinforcement learning (RL), improving information acquisition through multi-turn interactions with retrieval engines.However, existing approaches either optimize retrieval using search-only metrics (e.g., NDCG) that ignore downstream utility or fine-tune the entire LLM to jointly reason and retrieve-entangling retrieval with generation and limiting the real search utility and compatibility with frozen or proprietary models.In this work, we propose s3, a lightweight, modelagnostic framework that decouples the searcher from the generator and trains the searcher using a Gain Beyond RAG reward: the improvement in generation accuracy over naïve RAG.s3 requires only 2.4k training samples to outperform baselines trained on over 70× more data, consistently delivering stronger downstream performance across six general QA and five medical QA benchmarks. 1
Pengcheng Jiang, Xueqiang Xu, Jiacheng Lin, Jinfeng Xiao, Zifeng Wang 0008, Jimeng Sun 0001, Jiawei Han 0001
EMNLP2
2025 LogiCoL: Logically-Informed Contrastive Learning for Set-based Dense Retrieval
abstract
While significant progress has been made with dual-and bi-encoder dense retrievers, they often struggle on queries with logical connectives, a use case often overlooked yet important in downstream applications.In this paper, we introduce LOGICOL, a logically informed contrastive learning objective for dense retrievers.LOGICOL builds upon in-batch supervised contrastive learning and learns dense retrievers to respect the subset and mutually exclusive set relation between query results.We evaluated the effectiveness of LOGICOL in the entity retrieval task, where the model is expected to retrieve a set of Wikipedia entities that satisfy the implicit logical constraints of the query.We show that models trained with LOGICOL show improvements both in terms of retrieval performance and logical consistency in the results.We provide detailed analysis and insights to uncover why queries with logical connectives are challenging for dense retrievers and why LOGI-COL is effective.Our codes and data are available at https://github.com/yanzhen4/LogiCoL. A not B: Species of orchids inMalaysia but not Thailand.
Yanzhen Shen, Xueqiang Xu, Yunyi Zhang 0001, Chaitanya Malaviya, Dan Roth 0001
EMNLP3
2025 TELEClass: Taxonomy Enrichment and LLM-Enhanced Hierarchical Text Classification with Minimal Supervision
abstract
Hierarchical text classification aims to categorize each document into a set of classes in a label taxonomy, which is a fundamental web text mining task with broad applications such as web content analysis and semantic indexing. Most earlier works focus on fully or semi-supervised methods that require a large amount of human annotated data which is costly and time-consuming to acquire. To alleviate human efforts, in this paper, we work on hierarchical text classification with a minimal amount of supervision: using the sole class name of each node as the only supervision. Recently, large language models (LLM) have shown competitive performance on various tasks through zero-shot prompting, but this method performs poorly in the hierarchical setting because it is ineffective to include the large and structured label space in a prompt. On the other hand, previous weakly-supervised hierarchical text classification methods only utilize the raw taxonomy skeleton and ignore the rich information hidden in the text corpus that can serve as additional class-indicative features. To tackle the above challenges, we propose TELEClass, Taxonomy Enrichment and LLM-Enhanced weakly-supervised hierarchical text Classification, which combines the general knowledge of LLMs and task-specific features mined from an unlabeled corpus. TELEClass automatically enriches the raw taxonomy with class-indicative features for better label space understanding and utilizes novel LLM-based data annotation and generation methods specifically tailored for the hierarchical setting. Experiments show that TELEClass can significantly outperform previous baselines while achieving comparable performance to zero-shot prompting of LLMs with drastically less inference cost.
Yunyi Zhang 0001, Ruozhen Yang, Xueqiang Xu, Rui Li 0049, Jinfeng Xiao, Jiawei Han 0001
WWW3