VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Changran Xu
dblp:371/9869
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | DeepRTL: Bridging Verilog Understanding and Generation with a Unified Representation Model · ICLR 2025 Speculative Decoding for Verilog: Speed and Quality, All in One · DAC 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation › code generation with language models
inference acceleration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Speculative Decoding for Verilog: Speed and Quality, All in One · DAC 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation › code generation with language models
verilog code generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Speculative Decoding for Verilog: Speed and Quality, All in One · DAC 2025 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DeepRTL: Bridging Verilog Understanding and Generation with a Unified Representation Model · ICLR 2025 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
verilog generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DeepRTL: Bridging Verilog Understanding and Generation with a Unified Representation Model · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 2.6embedding similarity · 1.7curriculum learning · 1.7GPT Score · 1.7tokenization · 0.9speculative decoding · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Speculative Decoding for Verilog: Speed and Quality, All in OneabstractThe rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has revolutionized code generation tasks across various programming languages. However, the unique characteristics of programming languages, particularly those like Verilog with specific syntax and lower representation in training datasets, pose significant challenges for conventional tokenization and decoding approaches. In this paper, we introduce a novel application of speculative decoding for Verilog code generation, showing that it can improve both inference speed and output quality, effectively achieving speed and quality all in one. Unlike standard LLM tokenization schemes, which often fragment meaningful code structures, our approach aligns decoding stops with syntactically significant tokens, making it easier for models to learn the token distribution. This refinement addresses inherent tokenization issues and enhances the model’s ability to capture Verilog’s logical constructs more effectively. Our experimental results show that our method achieves up to a $5.05 \times$ speedup in Verilog code generation and increases pass@10 functional accuracy on RTLLM by up to $\mathbf{1 7. 1 9 \%}$ compared to conventional training strategies. These findings highlight speculative decoding as a promising approach to bridge the quality gap in code generation for specialized programming languages. Changran Xu, Yi Liu 0081, Yunhao Zhou, Shan Huang 0010, Ningyi Xu, Qiang Xu 0001 |
DAC | 1 |
| 2025 | DeepRTL: Bridging Verilog Understanding and Generation with a Unified Representation ModelabstractRecent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have shown significant potential for automating hardware description language (HDL) code generation from high-level natural language instructions. While fine-tuning has improved LLMs' performance in hardware design tasks, prior efforts have largely focused on Verilog generation, overlooking the equally critical task of Verilog understanding. Furthermore, existing models suffer from weak alignment between natural language descriptions and Verilog code, hindering the generation of high-quality, synthesizable designs. To address these issues, we present DeepRTL, a unified representation model that excels in both Verilog understanding and generation. Based on CodeT5+, DeepRTL is fine-tuned on a comprehensive dataset that aligns Verilog code with rich, multi-level natural language descriptions.
We also introduce the first benchmark for Verilog understanding and take the initiative to apply embedding similarity and GPT Score to evaluate the models' understanding capabilities. These metrics capture semantic similarity more accurately than traditional methods like BLEU and ROUGE, which are limited to surface-level n-gram overlaps. By adapting curriculum learning to train DeepRTL, we enable it to significantly outperform GPT-4 in Verilog understanding tasks, while achieving performance on par with OpenAI's o1-preview model in Verilog generation tasks. Yi Liu 0081, Changran Xu, Yunhao Zhou, Zeju Li, Qiang Xu 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |