Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rishabh Adiga

dblp:372/0916 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attention analysis
0.912025
Attention Speaks Volumes: Localizing and Mitigating Bias in Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation
0.912025
Attention Speaks Volumes: Localizing and Mitigating Bias in Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.912025
Attention Speaks Volumes: Localizing and Mitigating Bias in Language Models · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Attention Speaks Volumes: Localizing and Mitigating Bias in Language Models · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

attention score analysis · 0.9attention scaling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Attention Speaks Volumes: Localizing and Mitigating Bias in Language Models
abstract
We believe that analyzing attention is crucial for understanding bias in large language models (LLMs); in ambiguous comparative prompting frameworks, it provides insight into how the LLM distributes its focus across different entities, and how this contributes to biased decisions.To this end, we first introduce a metric to quantify the "entity preference" of an LLM.We then propose ATLAS, a technique to localize bias to specific layers of the LLM by analyzing attention scores and then reduce bias by scaling attention in these biased layers.To evaluate our method, we conduct extensive experiments across 3 datasets, 4 models, and 4 baseline approaches.Our experiments demonstrate that bias is concentrated in the later layers, typically around the last third.We also show how ATLAS effectively mitigates bias through targeted interventions without compromising downstream performance and an average increase of only 0.34% in perplexity when the intervention is applied.We see an average improvement of 0.28 points in the bias score across all the datasets.
Rishabh Adiga, Besmira Nushi, Varun Chandrasekaran
ACL (1)1