Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rishabh Adiga
dblp:372/0916
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attention analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Attention Speaks Volumes: Localizing and Mitigating Bias in Language Models · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Attention Speaks Volumes: Localizing and Mitigating Bias in Language Models · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Attention Speaks Volumes: Localizing and Mitigating Bias in Language Models · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Attention Speaks Volumes: Localizing and Mitigating Bias in Language Models · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
attention score analysis · 0.9attention scaling · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Attention Speaks Volumes: Localizing and Mitigating Bias in Language ModelsabstractWe believe that analyzing attention is crucial for understanding bias in large language models (LLMs); in ambiguous comparative prompting frameworks, it provides insight into how the LLM distributes its focus across different entities, and how this contributes to biased decisions.To this end, we first introduce a metric to quantify the "entity preference" of an LLM.We then propose ATLAS, a technique to localize bias to specific layers of the LLM by analyzing attention scores and then reduce bias by scaling attention in these biased layers.To evaluate our method, we conduct extensive experiments across 3 datasets, 4 models, and 4 baseline approaches.Our experiments demonstrate that bias is concentrated in the later layers, typically around the last third.We also show how ATLAS effectively mitigates bias through targeted interventions without compromising downstream performance and an average increase of only 0.34% in perplexity when the intervention is applied.We see an average improvement of 0.28 points in the bias score across all the datasets. Rishabh Adiga, Besmira Nushi, Varun Chandrasekaran |
ACL (1) | 1 |