Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emmanuel Pilliat

dblp:372/2418 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 53% Multi-agent systems · 24% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 24%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 75% Mathematical optimization · 25%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
crowdsourcing
0.912025
Recovering Labels from Crowdsourced Data: an Optimal and Polynomial-Time Method · COLT 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
minimax estimation
0.912025
Recovering Labels from Crowdsourced Data: an Optimal and Polynomial-Time Method · COLT 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction › ranking model
permutation models
0.912025
Recovering Labels from Crowdsourced Data: an Optimal and Polynomial-Time Method · COLT 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
ranking
0.912025
Recovering Labels from Crowdsourced Data: an Optimal and Polynomial-Time Method · COLT 2025
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction
0.812024
Optimal rates for ranking a permuted isotonic matrix in polynomial time · SODA 2024
Algorithms and data structures
ranking
0.812024
Optimal rates for ranking a permuted isotonic matrix in polynomial time · SODA 2024
Algorithms and data structures
spectral methods
0.812024
Optimal rates for ranking a permuted isotonic matrix in polynomial time · SODA 2024
Mathematical optimization
statistical estimation
0.812024
Optimal rates for ranking a permuted isotonic matrix in polynomial time · SODA 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
concentration inequalities
0.212024
Optimal rates for ranking a permuted isotonic matrix in polynomial time · SODA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spectral methods · 1.5pairwise comparison · 1.5dimension reduction · 1.5polynomial-time algorithm · 0.9isotonicity constraints · 0.9weighted means · 0.8weighted mean · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Recovering Labels from Crowdsourced Data: an Optimal and Polynomial-Time Method
abstract
Crowdsourcing involves aggregating meaningful information from partial and noisy data provided by a pool of $n$ workers across $d$ tasks. Traditional models, such as the Dawid-Skene model, assume that workers’ abilities are independent of tasks, limiting their applicability in real-world scenarios where worker ability often varies significantly across tasks. Recent advances have proposed permutation-based models, which relax these assumptions by imposing only isotonicity constraints on worker abilities. In this work, we study a permutation-based model where each worker $i$ has an ability $M_{ik}$ to recover a binary label $x_k^*\in\{-1,1\}$ for task $k$. The ability matrix $M$ is assumed to be isotonic up to a permutation of its rows, and only a fraction $\lambda$ of the worker-task pairs is observed. We focus on three primary objectives: recovering the true labels, ranking the workers, and estimating the ability matrix $M$. We introduce a polynomial-time and minimax optimal procedure to recover the labels, contradicting a conjecture in the literature regarding the existence of a statistical-computational gap for this problem. Additionally, building on the literature on ranking, we further introduce a polynomial-time procedure to rank the workers and to estimate their abilities. Notably, we show that ranking the workers or estimating their abilities is no harder when the true labels are unknown than when they are known, within the main regimes of interest in the isotonic model.
Emmanuel Pilliat
COLT1
2024 Optimal rates for ranking a permuted isotonic matrix in polynomial time
abstract
We consider a ranking problem where we have noisy observations from a matrix with isotonic columns whose rows have been permuted by some permutation π*. This encompasses many models, including crowd-labeling and ranking in tournaments by pair-wise comparisons. In this work, we provide an optimal and polynomial-time procedure for recovering π*, settling an open problem in [8]. As a byproduct, our procedure is used to improve the state-of-the art for ranking problems in the stochastically transitive model (SST). Our approach is based on iterative pairwise comparisons by suitable data-driven weighted means of the columns. These weights are built using a combination of spectral methods with new dimension-reduction techniques. In order to deal with the important case of missing data, we establish a new concentration inequality for sparse and centered rectangular Wishart-type matrices.
Emmanuel Pilliat, Alexandra Carpentier, Nicolas Verzelen
SODA1