Boqi Pan

dblp:372/3178 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 44% Language models and text generation · 44% Information extraction and text analysis · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › machine reading comprehension
long-context question answering
0.912025
NovelQA: Benchmarking Question Answering on Documents Exceeding 200K Tokens · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › long-context language modeling › context utilization › long-context modeling
long-context understanding
0.912025
NovelQA: Benchmarking Question Answering on Documents Exceeding 200K Tokens · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-hop reasoning evaluation · 0.9manual annotation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 NovelQA: Benchmarking Question Answering on Documents Exceeding 200K Tokens
abstract
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have pushed the boundaries of natural language processing, especially in long-context understanding. However, the evaluation of these models' long-context abilities remains a challenge due to the limitations of current benchmarks. To address this gap, we introduce NovelQA, a benchmark tailored for evaluating LLMs with complex, extended narratives. NovelQA, constructed from English novels, offers a unique blend of complexity, length, and narrative coherence, making it an ideal tool for assessing deep textual understanding in LLMs. This paper details the design and construction of NovelQA, focusing on its comprehensive manual annotation process and the variety of question types aimed at evaluating nuanced comprehension. Our evaluation of long-context LLMs on NovelQA reveals significant insights into their strengths and weaknesses. Notably, the models struggle with multi-hop reasoning, detail-oriented questions, and handling extremely long inputs, averaging over 200,000 tokens. Results highlight the need for substantial advancements in LLMs to enhance their long-context comprehension and contribute effectively to computational literary analysis.
Cunxiang Wang, Ruoxi Ning, Boqi Pan, Tonghui Wu, Qipeng Guo, Cheng Deng 0001, Guangsheng Bao, Xiangkun Hu, Zheng Zhang 0001, Yue Zhang 0004
ICLR3