This is a corrigendum for the article “A data-centric chip design agent framework for Verilog code generation” published in ACM Trans. Des. Autom. Electron Syst. 30, 6, Article 93 (October 2025), 27 pages.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential for automated hardware description language (HDL) code generation from high-level specifications. However, two critical challenges limit further progress in this domain: the scarcity of quality Verilog training data and the inability of current approaches to generate RTL code optimized for power, performance, and area (PPA) metrics. This article presents a comprehensive data-centric framework that addresses these limitations through innovations in both pre-fine-tuning data preparation and after-fine-tuning optimization strategies. In the pre-fine-tuning phase, we tackle the data scarcity problem with an automated design-data augmentation framework that generates high-volume, high-quality natural language specifications aligned with corresponding Verilog code and EDA scripts. Our approach creates a complete RTL-level feedback loop by augmenting EDA scripts, RTL code, and EDA tool feedback. In the after-fine-tuning phase, we focus on generating PPA-aware RTL code through a novel search and prompt framework. Our approach implements iterative filtering and selection of LLM-generated Verilog variants while providing high-quality predefined prompts, including composition and interface specifications. To evaluate the effectiveness of our data augmentation method, we fine-tune Llama 2-13B and Llama 2-7B models using the dataset generated by our augmentation framework. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in the Verilog generation tasks with LLMs. Moreover, the accuracy of Verilog generation surpasses that of the current state-of-the-art open-source Verilog generation model, increasing from 58.8% to 70.6% with the same benchmark. Our 13B model has a pass rate improvement compared with GPT-3.5 in Verilog generation and outperforms in EDA script (i.e., SiliconCompiler) generation with only 200 EDA script data. Additionally, to evaluate the effectiveness of the our agent framework, we compare the PPA on the GPT-3.5, where the results show that the agent refined RTL code can have a better quality than the generated RTL code only with GPT-3.5.

Recent advances in large language models have demonstrated their potential for automated generation of hardware description language (HDL) code from high-level prompts. Researchers have utilized fine-tuning to enhance the ability of these large language models (LLMs) in the field of Chip Design. However, the lack of Verilog data hinders further improvement in the quality of Verilog generation by LLMs. Additionally, the absence of a Verilog and electronic design automation (EDA) script data augmentation framework significantly increases the time required to prepare the training dataset for LLM trainers. This paper proposes an automated design-data augmentation framework, which generates high-volume and high-quality natural language aligned with Verilog and EDA scripts. For Verilog generation, it translates Verilog files to an abstract syntax tree and then maps nodes to natural language with a predefined template. For Verilog repair, it uses predefined rules to generate the wrong verilog file and then pairs EDA Tool feedback with the right and wrong verilog file. For EDA Script generation, it uses existing LLM(GPT-3.5) to obtain the description of the Script. To evaluate the effectiveness of our data augmentation method, we finetune Llama2--13B and Llama2-7B models using the dataset generated by our augmentation framework. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in the Verilog generation tasks with LLMs. Moreover, the accuracy of Verilog generation surpasses that of the current state-of-the-art open-source Verilog generation model, increasing from 58.8% to 70.6% with the same benchmark. Our 13B model (ChipGPT-FT1) has a pass rate improvement compared with GPT-3.5 in Verilog generation and outperforms in EDA script (i.e., SiliconCompiler) generation with only 200 EDA script data.