Buddhika Jayaneththi

dblp:372/5239 · also Buddhika Gayashani Jayaneththi · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-7813-3942ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 A Data Security Risk Management Framework for Medical Device Software AI Model Lifecycle: Alpha Version
Buddhika Jayaneththi, Fergal Mc Caffery, Gilbert Regan
ICSOFT1
2025 A Process Assessment Model for AI-Enabled Medical Device Software
Gilbert Regan, Buddhika Jayaneththi, Fergal McCaffery
EuroSPI (1)2
2024 Towards the Development of a Data Security Risk Management Framework for Medical Device Software AI Models
Buddhika Jayaneththi, Fergal McCaffery, Gilbert Regan
EuroSPI (1)1
2024 An Evaluation of Risk Management Standards and Frameworks for Assuring Data Security of Medical Device Software AI Models
abstract
Data is the backbone of Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications, including Medical Device Software (MDS) AI models which rely on sensitive health data. Assuring security of this sensitive health data is a key requirement for MDS AI models and there should be a structured way to manage the risk caused by data security compromises. Implementing a security risk management standard/framework is an effective way to develop a solid baseline for managing security risks, measuring the effectiveness of security controls and meeting compliance requirements. In this paper, nine risk management standards/frameworks in data/information security, AI, Medical Devices (MDs) and AI-enabled MDs domains are evaluated to identify their gaps and implementation challenges when applying them to assure data security of MDS AI models. The results show that currently there is no specific standard/framework that specifically addresses data security risk management of MDS AI models, and that existing standards/frameworks have several gaps such as complexity of the implementation process; lack of detailed threat and vulnerability catalogues; lack of a proper method for risk calculation/estimation; and lack of risk controls and control implementation details. These gaps necessitate the need for the development of a new data security risk management framework for MDS AI models.
Buddhika Jayaneththi, Fergal McCaffery, Gilbert Regan
ICSOFT1