VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Waka Ito
dblp:372/8235
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Developing a Japanese-Localization Code Generation Benchmark for LLMsabstractExisting code generation benchmarks, such as HumanEval, primarily evaluate universal algorithmic problems that do not address region-localized requirements. In realworld software development, localized knowledge, such as legal systems, cultural practices, and local language-specific processing is often required. To address this gap, we propose SakuraEval, the first region-localized code generation benchmark designed to evaluate Large Language Models, (LLMs,) performance in generating code that requires Japanese-localized knowledge. As a demonstration, of its effectiveness, we evaluated five LLMs with different language backgrounds using SakuraEval alongside HumanEval and JHumanEval. The results showed that all models exhibited significantly different tendencies in SakuraEval compared to existing benchmarks, with notable changes in their rankings that highlight each model’s Japanese-localized capabilities. SakuraEval provides valuable insights into the development of region-aware LLMs and underscores the importance of localized knowledge in code generation tasks. Haruka Tsuchida, Yuha Nishigata, Miyu Sato, Waka Ito, Kimio Kuramitsu |
APSEC | 4 |
| 2025 | Toward the Development of a Japanese Food Culture QA
Waka Ito, Manaka Odagaki, Haruka Tsuchida, Yuha Nishigata, Yui Obara, Kimio Kuramitsu |
PACLIC | 1 |
| 2025 | Non-English Code Generation with Cross-Lingual Chain of Thought
Yuha Nishigata, Waka Ito, Kimio Kuramitsu |
PACLIC | 2 |
| 2023 | Can ChatGPT Correct Code Based on Logical Steps?abstractChatGPT presents emerging opportunities in software development, yet its capabilities for understanding code remain largely understudied. This study aims to focus on the logical aspect of code comprehension of ChatGPT by examining its performance in detecting and fixing bugs. Our preliminary results suggest that ChatGPT seems to correct code in a different way than human logical steps. Nao Souma, Waka Ito, Momoka Obara, Takako Kawaguchi, Yuka Akinobu, Toshiyuki Kurabayashi, Haruto Tanno, Kimio Kuramitsu |
APSEC | 2 |